Home

The Economic Populist

Speak Your Mind 2 Cents at a Time

Discussion

  • Forums
    • Labor Economics
      • Labor
      • Outsourcing/Insourcing
        • Immigration
        • Professional Labor Issues
    • Macro Economics
      • Fiscal, Monetary Policy
      • Global
      • Tax Policy
      • Trade Policy
      • Wall Street
    • Politics
      • Congress
      • Executive Branch
    • Admin
  • Home
  • Reads
  • Discuss
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • About
  • Contact
Home Blogs midtowng's blog

New blog posts

  • U.S. Manufacturing Technology Consumption Bounces 26% Off Bottom
  • Economic Warfare? Europe versus Wall Street
  • Let's Chat Labor Productivity
  • Why we are headed into Depression
  • First Iceland, then the World
  • Creating State Level Jobs Programs: A Jobs Insurance Supplement
  • Sunday Morning Comics - Goldman Sucks Edition
  • One Thousand Names for Fraud
  • Friday Movie Night - Eamonn Fingleton
  • "Overwhelming Force"
more

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Navigation

  • User Guide
  • News aggregator

Recent Comments

  • the thing is
    40 min 2 sec ago
  • Many pieces on the transaction tax
    8 hours 10 min ago
  • Unions Here Also Targeting Wall Street
    8 hours 55 min ago
  • That Would Be An Immediate Low Cost Stimulus
    17 hours 13 min ago
  • No more mortgage companies feel shame or remorse
    1 day 2 hours ago
  • I'm getting jealous
    1 day 5 hours ago
  • They did something??? Wow
    1 day 8 hours ago
  • Let's address the real issues
    1 day 9 hours ago
  • outsourcing
    1 day 9 hours ago
  • "pre-ordained cheap labor
    1 day 11 hours ago
  • The claim is not true and
    1 day 12 hours ago
  • Wile E. Coyote Syndrome
    1 day 13 hours ago
  • Great Article, but.
    1 day 15 hours ago
  • economic facts & propaganda
    1 day 16 hours ago
  • If the outcome of the up and
    1 day 19 hours ago
  • class warfare
    2 days 7 hours ago
  • there is an email system on EP
    2 days 8 hours ago
  • Just absolutely absurd
    2 days 8 hours ago
  • Extortion
    2 days 10 hours ago
  • Interesting that democracy
    2 days 12 hours ago

Poll

Populist Du Jour

  • Why we are headed into Depression

Vox Populi

  • Holy Cow Batman! SIGTARP Barofsky says U.S. on the hook for $23.7 Trillion in bail out!
  • Subprime meltdown over; now comes the bad news
  • The Deflationary Recession of 2009?
  • The Panic of 2008: a turning point
  • Text of Bail Out Act Before Congress - TAKE ACTION NOW!
  • U3 and U6 Unemployment during the Great Depression
  • Scientist Who Laid Ground Work for Nobel Prize Drives a Bus, Can't get a Job

Active forum topics

  • A Letter Worth Reading from Senators Bernie Sanders & Jim Webb
  • Goldman Sachs Made $55.7 million on Build America Bond Fees
more

Atlanta Fed's Macroblog

  • Consumer credit, credit availability and The Credit CARD Act
  • In the beginning, there was a lender of last resort
more

BEA

  • U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, January 2010
more

iMFdirect

  • Something New Out of Africa: A Global Player
  • Africa Is Back
more

CBO

  • Estimate of the Budgetary Effects of the Senate-Passed Health Bill
  • Presentation on “Fiscal Policy Choices” to the National Association for Business Economics
more

powells

GAO

  • GAO-10-494T, Global Food Security: Progress toward a U.S. Governmentwide Strategy Is Under Way, but Approach Has Several Vulnerabilities, March 11, 2010
  • GAO-10-352, Global Food Security: U.S. Agencies Progressing on Governmentwide Strategy, but Approach Faces Several Vulnerabilities, March 11, 2010
more

Instapopulist

  • A Letter Worth Reading from Senators Bernie Sanders & Jim Webb
  • Goldman Sachs Made $55.7 million on Build America Bond Fees
  • Trade Deficit decreases $2.6 billion from last month - Trade January 2010
  • State Unemployment Maps for January 2010 - Unemployment increases in 30 States
  • Budget deficit hits another record
  • Get Ready for More Recessions
  • Joltin' up on JOLTS - Job openings increase in January 2010
more

Calculated Risk

  • Examiner: Lehman used undisclosed "balance sheet manipulation"
  • Bank Failure #27: LibertyPointe Bank, New York, New York
more

Naked Capitalism

  • NY Fed Under Geithner Implicated in Lehman Accounting Fraud
  • Guest Post: 82% of Americans Say Clamp Down on Wall Street • Financial Experts Say Rein In Big Banks to Save Economy • Politicians Say Keep Them Lobbying Dollars Coming!
more

Paul Krugman

  • Harry Gives 'Em Hell
  • Beware of Greeks Getting Gifts?
more

dorgan

The Baseline Scenario

  • Delaying Tactics On Display
  • The Coming Greek Debt Bubble
more

Eyes on Trade

  • Watch Lori Wallach LIVE on Bloomberg TV at 2pm
  • Putting Twitter Above Labor, Environmental, and Consumer Protections?
more

Econbrowser

  • Whither the Yuan?
  • Durable Goods and the Collapse of Global Trade
more

TradeReform.org

  • Remarks of President Barack Obama - As Prepared for Delivery
  • Remarks of President Barack Obama - As Prepared for Delivery
more

EconomPic

  • The Changing Face of American Debt
  • On the Price Stickiness of Imported Oil
more

Economist's View

  • "On Asymmetry, Reflexivity and Sovereign Default"
  • Is This the Best Congress Can Do for the Unemployed?
more

Economy in Crisis

  • House Members Working to Repeal NAFTA
  • The Wealthiest Nation in the World?
more

The Big Picture

  • Open Thread: Market Rally
  • Senator Bernard Sanders, Jim Webb on FOMC Governors
more

Credit Slips

  • Debt and the People, Part I: The Cold
  • Avoid Chapter 11 at All Cost!!!
more

Manufacture This

  • “Why Won’t Obama Label China A Currency Manipulator?”
  • Tight times for mill workers in Maine, Part 4
more

Alan Tonelson

  • Obama Urges China To Adopt More Market-Based Currency
  • Failed trade policies a good focus for tea party
more

black swan

Beat The Press

  • Judd Gregg Argues for Higher Unemployment
  • Fannie and Freddie's Losses Are Profits at Goldman Sachs
more

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

  • RGE's Wednesday Note - The Rising Risk of Double-Dipping
  • Bloomberg Reports Roubini Says Cautious China to Limit Yuan Gain to 4%
more

Zero Hedge

  • UniCredit Bank Warns Of Plunge In Sterling And Gilts, As Britain Is Next Country "To Be Pummeled By Investors"
  • Shorting U.S. Treasuries, a Historic Sucker Bet
more

The Mess That Greenspan Made

  • Cracking down on bank bonuses (in China)
  • The protests in Greece turn ugly
more

Styles Checks-125 x 125- Animiated Marvel Banner

Tax Justice Network

  • Onshore: beyond the voodoo void of finance
  • Median wealth for U.S. women of colour: $5
more

Brad Delong

  • Overtrading, Revulsion, and Discredit: The Financial Crisis of 2007-2010
  • Mark Thoma Pleads for More Expansionary Fiscal Policy
more

New Deal 2.0

  • Another Crisis on the Way? Rob Johnson on C-Span
  • Will The Senate Bill Look Like the House GOP’s Financial Reform Bill?
more

Steve Keen's Debtwatch

  • Everyone’s a critic…
  • T-Shirts for Kosciousko
more

Pension Pulse

  • A Culture of Corruption?
  • Public Pension Funds Doubling Up to Catch Up?
more

Angry Bear

  • Geithner and EU regulation of derivatives
  • Extending temporary tax breaks passed
more

Robert Reich

  • Bail Out Our Schools
  • Why the Continuing Bad Job Numbers Make it Harder (But Even More Important) To Pass Health Care Reform
more

Financial Armageddon

  • Statistical Color
  • A Rare Breed
more

What Recovery? Myths, Lies, and Green Shoots

Submitted by midtowng on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 12:29.
  • macroeconomics

There are those that honestly think you can make a sustainable economy based on people buying things they don't need with money they don't have. Then there are those who just want to sucker in the sheeple so they can fleece them one more time.
Finally, there are the sheeple themselves - so scared that they will buy into any feel-good message about Green Shoots that the politicians and media sells them, and even defend it.

What none of these three groups want is for the general public to know what the actual numbers really are.
They don't want me to show you what I am about to show you.

There's been two studies done recently that put things into perspective. One was done by Barry Eichengreen and Kevin O’Rourke, both professors of economics. The other was done by Paul Swartz for the Center of Geoeconomic Studies.

As you can see, worldwide industrial output is dropping as fast as it did during the Great Depression, while world trade is dropping even faster (which makes one wonder if Smoot-Hawley really wasn't as big of a deal as some make it out to be).

The other two charts show monetary inflation and massive government deficits. The two are directly related.
Those academics who are afraid of deflation think that these are good things. Consumers that are trying to stretch their meager paychecks think otherwise.

On a worldwide level, the recent stock market rally still doesn't come close to bringing us back to the disastrous level of the Great Depression.

Focus on America

Some will try to write off the charts above that this doesn't reflect what is happening in America. As if America is some sort of island disconnected from the rest of the world.
For those people I want to present a few other charts.


US Industrial Output

The drop is America's industrial output mirrors the drop in the world's industrial output, as well as the Great Depression experience.

It's a similar story for the stock market.

...and for our trade with the rest of the world.

As mentioned above, we have managed to avoid deflation with our massive deficit spending, but that also means the prudent are being punished in order to bail out the debtors.

Meanwhile the crash in home prices puts the Great Depression experience to shame. The consequences of this cannot be understated.

Finally we have unemployment. The common refrain from the Green Shooters is that the unemployment rate isn't nearly as bad as during the Great Depression, when unemployment hit 25%.
While technically true, it is also dishonest for two reasons.

#1) Unemployment didn't suddenly jump up to 25% overnight. It took four years to get there.
If you start counting from April 2008 (around the time that Bear Stearns went under), like most of the charts above do, then we are only 14 months into this Depression. The equivalent period of time during the Great Depression would take you to the fall of 1930.
So what was the unemployment rate in 1930? 8.7% What is the unemployment rate today? 9.4%

#2) The unemployment rate was measured differently during the Great Depression. For instance, there was no "discouraged workers" category. You were either employed, or not employed. You didn't fall out of the ranks of the unemployed because you didn't send someone a resume that week. Thus the unemployment numbers of today will understate real unemployment in a way that they wouldn't during the Great Depression.

  • midtowng's blog
  • addthis
  • Email this Blog entry
  • 5 points

Smoot-Hawley

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 12:51.

is something those Corporatists jumped on but it's not the cause of the Great Depression.

unlawfulcombatant did an analysis in a little more detail, but basically the U.S. was mostly a domestic economy, trade had little impact and the results from Smoot-Hawley were not that severe. Also previous to Smoot-Hawley tariffs were fairly high already.

Rated 5 by one user. see individual ratings
  • reply

This is the first of a series

Submitted by midtowng on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:20.

Next in line will be me attacking the defenders of the bailouts who are Keynesians and Monetarists. Both for how they were proven lacking in the past, and for how what is being tried today doesn't reflect them anyway.

Rated 5 by 3 users. see individual ratings
  • reply

exercise for the writers

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:35.

I'm beginning to think we need some Economics department and some sort of Professor adopting us for this is a lot of work! Shame we can't get course credits here and btw, where are others trying to do the same thing?

I'm right now swimming through various papers on regulatory reform and here is what I have found so far:

1. they have not diagnosed the real causes, thus real solutions are lacking and also all of the Proposals are not really analyzed due to not understanding the dynamics of what happened, the interactions in full.

2. there is so much opinion out there by various people wanting to say something when we really need a much more thorough research mentality of the economics writers on this topic. It's a lot of boilerplate with gems in the mix, but it's adding to the massive "read through" requirement to figure out enough to write up something intelligent or have insight.

You can see in the other comments what kind of exercise for the reader questions I already have...
the biggest is how the unemployment rate amplifies a bad situation into a disastrous situation. I think we're about to hit a threshold. People can hang on for a time on savings (myself included) but they are assuredly running out (myself included). (BTW: should we put up a jobs board on here? @@&*)#&*)!!!)

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Jobs Board

Submitted by manfrommiddletown on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 15:38.

You IT folks ought to think about the benefits of going for a guild.

With so much contract work, having an organization that could verify that workers possess the necessary skills for the job, and providing access to guild sponsored health insurance and other benefits limited to members could be attractive to companies.

The idea is that you have a limited membership, which own the guild in common, and elect a leadership, that companies are able to come to to find contract labor.

It's the model that has prevailed in building trades for the better part of the last century.

Collective organization of this type can do a great deal to ease the burden of periods of unemployment, and can provide individual workers greater leverage.

Rated 5 by 2 users. see individual ratings
  • reply

I am not personally "I.T."

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 16:35.

but that said, getting these people to organize is like pulling teeth. I put together a techie community site, similar to EP @ www.noslaves.com and believe this or not, they are refusing to use it.

I'm actually not a "techie" by skill, but STEM, which is Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics. This area really does seriously need labor representation, organization and it's beyond unreal trying to get people to join up and do something.

but I.T. is related and truly the worst area under attack for labor arbitrage but so is STEM and this is all the way to PhD level skills, years of expertise, education, training...

it's just unbelievable considering the level of difficulty in these occupational areas.

BTW: anyone reading this in the above occupational categories, noslaves.com is there for people to use to try to create a community space.

Rated 5 by one user. see individual ratings
  • reply

We tried that

Submitted by seebert on Mon, 06/22/2009 - 09:21.

During the last recession. My programmer's guild membership # is 1113.

Didn't help much then- might help some now.
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

1920's excesses caused Great Depression

Submitted by Anonymous Drive-by (not verified) on Mon, 06/22/2009 - 04:52.

There is no possible way smoot-hawley had anything to do with causing the Great Depression. It was not put into place until the early 1930's, long AFTER the economy/stock-market crashed. It is not possible for the cause to occur after the effect!!

Instead, the excesses of the 1920's (credit/banking/wall street excesses) are the primary cause of the Great Depression (sounds familiar - eh?).

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Brad Delong graph on unemployment projections vs. reality

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:03.

Chart from Delong's post Comment for the Economist on Christina Romer (2009), "The Lessons of 1937":
This was left in middle's unemployment analysis from yesterday over at DK. It's shockingly enlightening.

unemployment rate real vs. projected may 2009

My first point is that over the past six months the economy has been a severe disappointment. Output and employment have fallen much faster than people were projecting last December. Romer and Bernstein (2009) projected at the very start of this year that unemployment in the U.S. would reach a peak of 7.9% in the summer of 2009. But unemployment now in mid-June is about 9.7%, with 10% baked in the cake and the possibility existing that it might go much higher. The signs that the cliff-dive of employment has come to an end are very few

Rated 5 by one user. see individual ratings
  • reply

more industrial production

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:11.

More graphs here on the latest industrial production and capacity crash & burn.

While I attempt to navigate more detailed papers on financial regulation (I am believing if I'm having a rough time delving into these details and it takes a 20 year career as an economics professor at Yale to even get a clue on what the hell just happened, we're in for bad juju on regulatory reform that addresses the real underlying causes!)...

over and over again what strikes me is how the United States poo poos, ignores, sells out the United States manufacturing and small business sectors. Notice that? When it comes to real jobs which produce real things...
pretty much all we see is Politicians, the Obama administration handing even more of our real economy over to China, India...pretty much any nation who flies over here and demands it.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

unemployment rates of Great depression

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:28.

NDD wrote up a great reference post here on U3/U6 est. for the Great Depression.

So, question now is does this actually scale correctly and also, what is the slope during the start of the Great Depression (i.e. rate of change) of unemployment stats and does that correlate to DeLong's slope (which looks like a rocket)?

This is an exercise for the reader, need to take the table data and create a graph, calculate up the slope as well as examine a threshold level when unemployment begats unemployment begats macro economic collapse begats unemployment (I believe this is in the book of Economic Genesis: Ch. 5)

Not yet rated.
  • reply

I couldn't find monthly numbers

Submitted by midtowng on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:33.

I checked three different book stores and the main library in San Francisco. I couldn't find monthly unemployment numbers for the Great Depression anywhere.
If I could then I could scale these pretty well.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

data sets

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 06/20/2009 - 13:41.

He has some references to where he got his numbers:
N. Andrews.

NDD's Great Depression series part 2 here (there are 4 parts) he pulled up a lot of raw data and has references in these posts.

I know NDD hunted high and low for raw stats before 1947, so he might have additional resources. He even pulled some from an appendix in an old Milton Friedman text. I'll look around in my cabinets too.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

there is definitely a

Submitted by irs tax settlement (not verified) on Mon, 06/29/2009 - 11:00.

there is definitely a recovery coming by the end of year. Just past has shown that it is coming.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Under what theory?

Submitted by seebert on Mon, 06/29/2009 - 17:28.

We still have two days to go before we can check my prediction that will give us how bad it's going to get. What's your definition of recovery, and how shall we measure it?
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <b> <address> <blockquote> <br> <caption> <center> <code> <dd> <del> <div> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <i> <img> <li> <ol> <p> <pre> <span> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <tbody> <td> <tfoot> <th> <thead> <tr> <u> <ul> <tr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Image links with 'rel="lightbox"' in the <a> tag will appear in a Lightbox when clicked on.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Add to Technorati Favorites

Privacy Policy

Google Delicious Yahoo! Bloglines Newsgator MSN AOL Rojo Newsburst RSSFwd
© Economic Populist 2008-2009