Home

The Economic Populist

Speak Your Mind 2 Cents at a Time

Discussion

  • Forums
    • Labor Economics
      • Labor
      • Outsourcing/Insourcing
        • Immigration
        • Professional Labor Issues
    • Macro Economics
      • Fiscal, Monetary Policy
      • Global
      • Tax Policy
      • Trade Policy
      • Wall Street
    • Politics
      • Congress
      • Executive Branch
    • Admin
  • Home
  • Reads
  • Discuss
  • RSS Feed
  • Twitter
  • About
  • Contact
Home Blogs Robert Oak's blog

New blog posts

  • A Brief History of Securitization
  • Cuomo Takes on The Money Party
  • PIGS and the ouzo effect
  • Sunday Morning Comics - Yeah Yes Men Edition
  • Must Read Posts - Sometimes you just can't say it better for 02.06.10
  • Friday Movie Night - 25 Million Pounds
  • Is Residential Real Estate a Ticking Time Bomb?
  • It's time to live within our means once again
  • U.S. Manufacturing, Hire America & Buy American
  • Sunday Morning Comics - Hayek vs. Keynes Edition
more

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Navigation

  • User Guide
  • News aggregator

Recent Comments

  • Hi I am from Slovakia - a
    8 hours 14 min ago
  • Oh yes
    11 hours 8 min ago
  • Dylan Ratigan show today
    11 hours 45 min ago
  • SIGTARP is "the tell"
    13 hours 41 min ago
  • Actually,
    13 hours 51 min ago
  • What surprised me about that interview
    13 hours 56 min ago
  • True, but they are only making matters....
    15 hours 29 min ago
  • Part of the problem is the dire straits of states and cities
    16 hours 16 min ago
  • automatic graph scaling
    18 hours 37 min ago
  • Thanks
    19 hours 21 min ago
  • Euro being heavily shorted now
    19 hours 41 min ago
  • blog post idea
    19 hours 52 min ago
  • Great Post
    19 hours 59 min ago
  • there goes what's left of savings and retirement funds
    21 hours 3 min ago
  • FYI
    21 hours 10 min ago
  • Let's sure hope so
    23 hours 3 min ago
  • Greece default doesn't matter yet then it does ...
    1 day 37 min ago
  • Actually the biggest waste of government money
    1 day 53 min ago
  • We're In Holding Pattern Until 2012..
    1 day 3 hours ago
  • When is the MSM going to point out we are LOSING the best jobs?
    1 day 4 hours ago

Poll

Populist Du Jour

  • Holy Cow Batman! SIGTARP Barofsky says U.S. on the hook for $23.7 Trillion in bail out!

Vox Populi

  • Holy Cow Batman! SIGTARP Barofsky says U.S. on the hook for $23.7 Trillion in bail out!
  • Subprime meltdown over; now comes the bad news
  • The Deflationary Recession of 2009?
  • The Panic of 2008: a turning point
  • Text of Bail Out Act Before Congress - TAKE ACTION NOW!
  • Scientist Who Laid Ground Work for Nobel Prize Drives a Bus, Can't get a Job
  • 2009: Recession vs. Recovery (Update 4)

Active forum topics

  • How important is Greece?
  • Economic Stress hits new record
more

Atlanta Fed's Macroblog

  • Is good news hidden in bad employment numbers?
  • Southeast businesses offer insights on capital spending plans
more

iMFdirect

  • Getting Ready to Join the Eurozone Club
  • More to Do on Financial Sector Tax, Says IMF’s Lipsky
more

CBO

  • Visit to Morehouse College
  • CBO Estimates a Federal Budget Deficit of $434 Billion in the First Four Months of Fiscal Year 2010
more

powells

GAO

  • GAO-10-248, Highway Research: The Second Strategic Highway Research Program Addresses the Four Required Areas, but Some Anticipated Research Was Not Funded, February 5, 2010
  • GAO-10-25, Troubled Asset Relief Program: Treasury Needs to Strengthen Its Decision-Making Process on the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, February 5, 2010
more

Instapopulist

  • Economic Stress hits new record
  • The Federal Reserve's Exit Plan is Another Bank Bail Out Pig Fest
  • How important is Greece?
  • China Eastern Jiangsu Provence raises minimum wage, wow $140 a month!
  • Bank Failure Friday - one this week, 200 failures expected this year
  • Dr. Robert Reich on financial reform
  • Banksters ready to side-step new credit card rules
more

Calculated Risk

  • BLS: Few Job Openings in December
  • NFIB: Small Business Owners Report "shortage of customers"
more

Naked Capitalism

  • Links 2/9/10
  • Head of BIS Calls for Bigger Liquidity Buffers
more

Paul Krugman

  • Euro perspective
  • Know Your Deficits
more

dorgan

The Baseline Scenario

  • Elizabeth Warren Calls Out Wall Street
  • Whose Fault?
more

EPI

  • Unemployment drops to 9.7% despite more job losses
  • Unemployment rate drops to 9.7% despite more job losses
more

Eyes on Trade

  • Exciteable Young Men
  • Exciteable Young Men
more

Econbrowser

  • Letting the EGTRRA and JGTRRA Provisions Expire
  • Reactions to last week's economic data
more

TradeReform.org

  • CO-Gov: Dem leading
  • CO-03: Salazar not a sure bet
more

EconomPic

  • The Death of the Workforce
  • Market Recap (2/08/10)
more

Economist's View

  • "Fine Print, Deceptive Pricing, and Buried Tricks"
  • "The Inexact Science of Economics"
more

Economy in Crisis

  • Why Layoffs are Not Beneficial to Companies
  • A Growing Concern
more

The Big Picture

  • 5 Most Expensive Pieces of Art
  • Food Stamps – The Great Recession’s Soup Lines
more

Credit Slips

  • Bankruptcies Maintain Similar Month-to-Month Rate in January
  • Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble
more

Manufacture This

  • The Early Shift
  • The Future of Manufacturing…Part Five
more

Alan Tonelson

  • More on Obama's Export Delusions
  • Domestic Manufacturers Urge Obama to Back Up Tougher China Talk With Immediate Currency-Manipulation Bill Push
more

black swan

Beat The Press

  • Jingoism and the Budget Deficit: Using Any Tactic to Advance the Budget Cutting Agenda
  • Social Security Benefits Will Be Paid, It is the Law
more

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

  • Roubini Bloomberg Interview on Sovereign Debt and U.S. Outlook
  • RGE's Weekly Roundup
more

Zero Hedge

  • S&P Revises Outlooks on Citigroup, Bank Of America To Negative From Stable
  • First Greece, Now Spain: Moore Capital, Brevan Howard, Paulson As Well As JPM And Goldman Implicated In Spanish CDS Rout
more

The Mess That Greenspan Made

  • On the Fed's exit strategy
  • Tuesday morning links
more

Tax Justice Network

  • OECD: involve civil society and developing countries in peer review process
  • Football premier league seeks elite opt-out
more

Brad Delong

  • links for 2010-02-09
  • Pretending that Nothing Is Wrong When Your Hair on Fire Does Not Send a Good Signal...
more

Steve Keen's Debtwatch

  • Interview on Switzer TV
  • Vote for Ignoble/Dynamite Economics Prize
more

New Deal 2.0

  • Bill Black to BofA Chairman: Racist bank adviser in Germany must go
  • Straws in the Wind: The 5 Supremes
more

Pension Pulse

  • Greece Implements Pension Reforms
  • Drop in Dividends Leaves Pensions Exposed?
more

Angry Bear

  • Limit Banks' Proprietary Trading? Links Worth Noting on Possible Reprise of Glass Steagall Maybe
  • AN IMMODEST PROPOSAL
more

Robert Reich

  • Obomanomics One Year Out
  • 2010 Rancho Mirage Speakers Series
more

Noslaves.com

  • Economy in Crisis Calls Out Bill Gates and Lobbyist H-1B Propaganda
  • Jobs Bill
more

Financial Armageddon

  • The Next Phase of My Evaluation
  • The Next Phase of My Evaluation
more

Alternative Bail Out Plans

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 09/27/2008 - 11:30.
  • alternatives
  • bail out

While Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank hold Press Conferences claiming the Republicans won't modify the bad bankruptcy bill to enable renegotiation of bad primary residence mortgages.... and Barney Frank claims the Paulson plan is the only plan that can pass in some modified form....

Other economists are writing up their own alternative plans and posting them online.

 

A few are reposted here.

Bill King's Plan

 

Premises

  • The US credit system is broken.
  • The Paulsen-Bernanke Bailout Plan does not insure that those banks and brokers that receive bailout aid will increase lending. The reality is the market is hoarding liquidity and these banks are likely to do the same. More importantly consumer lending has been a small, often insignificant part of their business. They made money by trading and through securitization of debt.
  • It is necessary to create a new system parallel with the existing dysfunctional system in order to mitigate the inevitable economic and financial damage and to facilitate, as seamless as possible, the transition to a functioning financial system or new model of credit and banking.
  • The Wall Street model, securitization and extreme leverage, is obsolete.
  • US financial institutions need to recapitalize.
  • Hank and Ben assert that it is paramount to keep credit flowing to consumers; the bail out is a necessary adjunct.
  • Paulsen and Hank’s bailout plan is tantamount to bailing out Univac, Digital Equipment, etc, in the eighties, which would’ve retarded the development of Dell, Microsoft, Intel and other nascent technology companies.
  • It’s wasteful & foolish to put more money in an obsolete non-functioning system
  • Big banks and brokers made most of their earnings over the past several years in trading, not consumer lending. And now their derivatives are THE problem
  • If you want to get money to the consumer: the less middlemen, the better.
  • Decentralization of liquidity, lending and risk is necessary to refurbish the financial system. The illiquidity of a few large banks is collapsing the system.

Basics of the King Report Bailout Plan

  • Directly recapitalize banks by the US government allocating $500 billion into a plan for community-type banks to increase their capital in partnership with the government.
  • The government would match existing or some percentage of existing bank capital. If it would be better, a separate bank could be created. Place a limit of say $1 billion per bank.
  • This would create $5 trillion of credit at conservative 10 to 1 leverage. This is more than the entire private mortgage market. It is a much better use of capital instead of absorbing $700 billion of losses with no means to discern resultant credit creation.
  • Give the banks a tax rate of 15% on consumer and commercial lending for 5 years and the right to buy out the government share of the operation at some premium.
  • Only banks that meet some metric, like a Texas Ratio of 50, are eligible.
  • To help the big banks, allow them to create a consumer & commercial lending facility with the 15% tax rate benefit. This should entice private equity and sovereign funds as well as Wall Street remuneration that was garnered over the past decade or so.
  •  Prohibit trading, especially derivatives, in consumer & Commercial lending operations. However pure hedging would be allowed.
  • Immediately increase FDIC-insured bank deposits and money funds to $1 million per eligible account.

Further considerations


  • Foreign banks in the US could be included if they have respective funding from their government.
  • The real estate problem is due to the fact that American incomes do NOT support current prices. Easy credit allowed them to purchase homes they couldn’t afford.
  • Any solution to clear the real estate market must entail hiking income, which is very difficult, or allowing prices to drop to levels that the average American can support. This helps average Americans, not the big banks and investors stuck with overpriced mortgages.
  • No bailout for the imprudent and reckless but a means to directly help Americans and procure capital from private and sovereign sources because a new financial system must be implemented.
  • This is not likely to be the final model but it is a stop-gap measure that will resonate with average Americans. It’s a way to connect with Middle America because it benefits them directly and is not an exclusive Wall Street bailout.
  • The cause of our current financial morass is Big Government + Big Business = Crony Capitalism + Funny Money = concentration of wealth and risk + declining US living standards.
  • The solution is decentralization of the financial system, like the tech industry, which will lower systemic risk, foster competition and yield better ideas, services and companies.

 

 

Lucian A. Bebchuk's Plan and Working Paper

  1. The Treasury should only buy troubled assets at fair market value. 
  2. The Treasury should be allowed to purchase, again at fair market value, new securities issued by financial institutions needing additional capital.
  3. To ensure that asset purchases are made at fair market value, the Treasury should buy them through multibuyer competitive processes with appropriate incentives

In more detail ,  Bebchuk declares underlying  principles of a bail out:

  1. No overpaying for troubled assets: The Treasury’s authority to purchase troubled assets should be limited to doing so at fair market value.
  2. Addressing undercapitalization problems directly: Because the purchase of troubled assets at fair market value may leave financial firms severely under-capitalized, the Treasury’s authority should be expanded to allow purchasing, again at fair market value, new securities issued by financial institutions in need of additional capital.
  3. Market-based discipline: to ensure that purchases are made at fair market value, the Treasury should conduct them through multi-buyer competitive processes with appropriate incentives.
  4. Inducing infusion of private capital: to further expand the capital available to the financial sector, and to reduce the use of public funds for this purpose, financial firms should be required or induced to raise capital through right offerings to their existing shareholders.

 

Roubini HOME 10 Step Plan

  1. First, like in the Treasury TARP plan you need to buy illiquid/toxic assets and take them off the balance sheet of banks and financial institutions to reliquify them and allow new credit creation.
    • The biggest problem here  is one of the proper valuation and the proper price
  2. In exchange for the purchase of illiquid asset  the government gets preferred shares.
  3. Inject further public capital in the form of preferred shares in the financial institutions.
  4. Existing shareholders of the banks need to take a first-tier loss to minimize the risks for the government share.
    • Suspend dividend payments.
  5. Convert some of this unsecured debt into equity.
  6. Let other insolvent banks and financial institutions to go bust and disappear.
  7. Failed banks go to the HOME.
  8. A HOLC-like program for debt reduction of the household sector.
  9. Change of the Basel II capital adequacy ratios.
  10. Start implementing rapidly a reform of the system of regulation and supervision of financial institutions in a world of financial globalization.

Mother Jones has a list of other alternatives and the reasons they will not work.

 

There seems to be a very common thread coming to consensus on these alternative plans.  My take of the best ideas to date:

  • Key is the pricing and exposure, timing of that exposure of bad assets.  Do this wrong and it could exacerbate the situation. 
  • A key missing element is a HOLC and the ability to renegotiate from the bottom up, household debt and bad mortgages.  Build a new house on Sand....
  • Final key is to not let further bad banking practices continue.

 

This WSJ Shiller Interview also confirms one of the major issues is the pricing of these assets which the Treasury Secretary is proposing to buy:

 

One thing is certain, after these closed door deals are finalized if Congress doesn't realize they need to release every detail to the public before voting.....this country just might revolt.  The rage is churning.

 

  • Robert Oak's blog
  • addthis
  • Email this Blog entry
  • 0 points

DeFazio - Make Wall Street Pay for It's Own Bail Out

Submitted by Robert Oak on Sat, 09/27/2008 - 22:07.


I find this interesting and I wonder if it's true. Honestly DeFazio has been so right on so many issues, he probably knows something we don't.

Tax on each transaction, well how many are there per day? (stock transactions).

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Invest in America instead of Bailout

Submitted by John Petty (not verified) on Tue, 09/30/2008 - 10:17.

This is a copy of a letter that I have sent to Sen. Obama:
I agree with most of your policies, however I do not agree with any type of bailout for Wall Street because:
1. It will increase our national debt and make it harder to achieve the goals that you want during your term in office.
2. It will weaken the Dollar, cause inflation, and could hurt our credit rating.
3. It will not restore confidence. It will only show people how bad things are.
4. Our tax money should not be used in such a manner.
5. This problem manifested itself in the lower & middle class; and a bailout would be trying to repair it by giving money to the upper class.
I don't want to just complain without offering a potential solution. I suggest that instead of another stimulus package; that the $700 Billion be spent on GREEN Energy. Fill the empty abandon factories with workers making wind turbines, solar parts, electric cars, etc. This will create jobs; stimulate investments; and curb global warming. Lenders will be more likely to lend to these projects if the U.S. is involved. You could also sell "Energy Bonds" instead of war bonds. A free check from the government is nice, but the money doesn't go too far. People want to stand on their own two feet; not receive handouts. It would give people a sense of accomplishment; a common united cause. Once workers started making money, credit would once again free up. The problem with the bailout is that if it does not work, we are out of bullets! It could be the straw that broke the camel's back!

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Bailout bill

Submitted by mandi (not verified) on Tue, 09/30/2008 - 10:54.

Ok here is the deal what actually needs to happen is we need to instead of the 700 billion bailout they need to give so to say another stimulus to the American people, lets say just a round number 150k and allow us to spend it as we see fit, not only will this help bail out the middle and lower class Americans with bill paying but it will also surge the economy because of the cash flow that it will be getting. I know there are people who would abuse it but honestly what is it to them if they cant help us by giving us the money instead of the sentate

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Bailout alternative

Submitted by nygirl (not verified) on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 10:28.

I heard of another very similar plan. Every man & woman over the age of 18 (voting age) would receive approximately $400,000. This money would be taxed (back to the government.) These recipients would then be mandated to pay off their mortgage and credit card debt (giving liquidity back to the banks.) Plan would only cost 70 Billion rather than the proposed 700 Billion. If the government chose to do some other shoring up of the banking institutions, there's plenty of money left over and those of us who haven't contributed to the banking debacle would actually have some money in our pocket.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Bailout alternative

Submitted by Blueneck on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 12:58.

might want to check your math

Rated 5 by one user. see individual ratings
  • reply

I missed that

Submitted by seebert on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 13:01.

You're right- she's off by AT LEAST a factor of 1000.

Rated 5 by one user. see individual ratings
  • reply

math

Submitted by Robert Oak on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 13:04.

at least people are reading, trying to engage. I saw that math error and this is so common, folks just do not have a sense of numbers, of proportion....and so you get these sorts of comments.

If we can get people to start being able to read numbers, graphs...that will only help to make smart policy Populist.

But, this is the people's blog so correcting these sorts of things is part of this.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

It occurs to me this could be plan B

Submitted by seebert on Thu, 10/09/2008 - 12:59.

As it would work as well, and for small enough money to pay for it, if it was enacted next January or February (when Congress evaluates the current bailout and figures out if they want to spend the final $350 billion) and still save money.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

House Republicans release a Plan

Submitted by Robert Oak on Tue, 09/30/2008 - 11:18.

Plan (pdf).

I haven't had time to analyze it. I do know most experts said the insurance idea simply will not work and on the repatriations of overseas capital.....well, I think that just might work and is also a common Democratic idea too.

On the tax code changes, well, that still reduces revenues (i.e. indirectly the taxpayer pays) but considering a $700B giveaway, might not be such a bad way to do it.

On the change in accounting...hmmm....I'd suggest a temporary suspension and demand hearings from various accounting, economic, fiscal experts be held for I am unsure of the real effects.

More later.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Bailout Plan Alternatives

Submitted by Frederik (not verified) on Tue, 09/30/2008 - 19:11.

If you were to listen to financial news, a la Bloomberg, as 99% of Wall Street does, you may have heard the show "On The Economy" were alternatives are discussed by the 'best minds on Wall Street'...there you would have heard Charles Calomiris, a professor at Columbia speak intelligently about the equity purchase solution. His approach is generally supported by others in the field (http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/1683) At the time of the interview on Bloomberg he had not been contacted by a single member of Congress regarding potential alternatives to the Paulson plan. The Calomiris plan minimizes the taxpayer risk (along the lines of a Warren Buffett type of investment) and leaves the debt in the private sector to unwind.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

you're kidding

Submitted by Robert Oak on Tue, 09/30/2008 - 20:51.

I've heard that on other shows where they are just railroading this through without any hearings, any experts testifying and even their own CBO has said it's simply impossible to estimate the costs and clearly questions Paulson's plan.

I think that's what DeFazio are trying to do, they know a few things are bi-partisan, they will work, already vetted (notice they are taking the plan from the expert who managed the S&L crisis) and get those through but to not even based a plan on a consensus of experts or at least discover cause and effect....well, they also shut out all but a few even in "negotiations" (read obfuscation) of the bill.

Not yet rated.
  • reply

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <b> <address> <blockquote> <br> <caption> <center> <code> <dd> <del> <div> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <i> <img> <li> <ol> <p> <pre> <span> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <tbody> <td> <tfoot> <th> <thead> <tr> <u> <ul> <tr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Image links with 'rel="lightbox"' in the <a> tag will appear in a Lightbox when clicked on.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Add to Technorati Favorites

Privacy Policy

Google Delicious Yahoo! Bloglines Newsgator MSN AOL Rojo Newsburst RSSFwd
© Economic Populist 2008-2009