An Economy Destroyed -- The Enemy Is Washington

Originally published by OpEdNews.com
by Paul Craig Roberts
Optimized-flameout.png
Recently, the bond rating agencies that gave junk derivatives triple-A ratings threatened to downgrade US Treasury bonds if the White House and Congress did not reach a deficit reduction deal and debt ceiling increase. The downgrade threat is not credible, and neither is the default threat. Both are make-believe crises that are being hyped in order to force cutbacks in Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.

If the rating agencies downgraded Treasuries, the company executives would be arrested for the fraudulent ratings that they gave to the junk that Wall Street peddled to the rest of the world. The companies would be destroyed and their ratings discredited. The US government will never default on its bonds, because the bonds, unlike those of Greece, Spain, and Ireland, are payable in its own currency. Regardless of whether the debt ceiling is raised, the Federal Reserve will continue to purchase the Treasury's debt. If Goldman Sachs is too big to fail, then so is the US government.

There is no budget focus on the illegal wars and military occupations that the US government has underway in at least six countries, or the 66-year old US occupations of Japan and Germany and the ring of military bases being constructed around Russia. The total military/security budget is in the vicinity of $1.1-$1.2 trillion, or 70% -75% of the federal budget deficit.

In contrast, Social Security is solvent. Medicare expenditures are coming close to exceeding the 2.3% payroll tax that funds Medicare, but it is dishonest for politicians and pundits to blame the US budget deficit on "entitlement programs."

Entitlements are funded with a payroll tax. Wars are not funded. The criminal Bush regime lied to Americans and claimed that the Iraq war would only cost $70 billion at the most and would be paid for with Iraq oil revenues. When Bush's chief economic adviser, Larry Lindsay, said the Iraq invasion would cost $200 billion, the White House Moron fired him. In fact, Lindsay was off by a factor of 20. Economic and budget experts have calculated that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have consumed $4,000 billion in out-of-pocket and already incurred future costs. In other words, the ongoing wars and occupations have already eaten up the $4 trillion by which Obama hopes to cut federal spending over the next 10 years. Bomb now, pay later.

As taxing the rich is not part of the political solution, the focus is on rewarding the insurance companies by privatizing Medicare at some future date with government subsidized insurance premiums, by capping Medicaid, and by loading the diminishing middle class with additional Social Security tax.

Washington's priorities and those of its presstitutes could not be clearer. President Obama, like George W. Bush before him, both parties in Congress, the print and TV media, and National Public Radio have made it clear that war is a far more important priority than health care and old age pensions for Americans.

The American people and their wants and needs are not represented in Washington. Washington serves powerful interest groups, such as the military/security complex, Wall Street and the banksters, agribusiness, the oil companies, the insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, and the mining and timber industries. Washington endows these interests with excess profits by committing war crimes and terrorizing foreign populations with bombs, drones, and invasions; by deregulating the financial sector and bailing it out of its greed-driven mistakes after it has stolen Americans' pensions, homes, and jobs; by refusing to protect the land, air, water, oceans and wildlife from polluters and despoilers, and by constructing a health-care system with the highest costs and highest profits in the world.

The way to reduce health care costs is to take out gobs of costs and profits with a single-payer system. A private health-care system can continue to operate alongside for those who can afford it.

The way to get the budget under control is to stop the gratuitous hegemonic wars, wars that will end in a nuclear confrontation.

The US economy is in a deepening recession from which recovery is not possible, because American middle class jobs in manufacturing and professional services have been offshored and given to foreigners. US GDP, consumer purchasing power, and tax base have been handed over to China, India, and Indonesia in order that Wall Street, shareholders, and corporate CEOs can earn more.

When the goods and services produced offshore come back into America, they arrive as imports. The trade balance worsens, the US dollar declines further in exchange value, and prices rise for Americans, whose incomes are stagnant or falling.

This is economic destruction. It always occurs when an oligarchy seizes control of a government. The short-run profits of the powerful are maximized at the expense of the viability of the economy.

The US economy is driven by consumer demand, but with 22.3% unemployment, stagnant and declining wages and salaries, and consumer debt burdens so high that consumers cannot borrow to spend, there is nothing to drive the economy.

Washington's response to this dilemma is to increase the austerity! Cutting back Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, forcing down wages by destroying unions and offshoring jobs (which results in a labor surplus and lower wages), and driving up the prices of food and energy by depreciating the dollar further erodes consumer purchasing power. The Federal Reserve can print money to rescue the crooked financial institutions, but it cannot rescue the American consumer.

As a final point, confront the fact that you are even lied to about "deficit reduction." Even if Obama gets his $4 trillion "deficit reduction" over the next decade, it does not mean that the current national debt will be $4 trillion less than it currently is. The "reduction" merely means that the growth in the national debt will be $4 trillion less than otherwise. Regardless of any "deficit reduction," the national debt 10 years from now will be much higher than it presently is.

Meta: 

Comments

single payer health care

I cannot believe I am reading this. A paleo-conservative gets that the cheapest way out of health care costs is single payer. Congrats.

Although I've seen this 22% unemployment rate bandied about and I do not know where it's coming from. I need real calculations, even estimates and I will assume they are adding in those not in the labor force who are really wanting a job somehow in that number.

Not to say that there is not a jobs crisis, there sure as hell is, but I'm a stickler for accuracy.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

RE: Single payer health care

The 22% is the U6 number published by the Federal Government Labor Department and includes those collecting UI, those who fell of the UI Roles and are not working yet, officially "intentionally dropped out of the labor force", and those who have found a part-time job but want a full time job and can't find one.

The one the newspapers print every day is the official U3 number, those collecting UI.

Since you are a stickler for accuracy, you may want to read the Labor Department's documentation occasionally.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

you might read site unemployment posts before insulting people.

Job JOLT overview, U6 = 15.8%, May, 16.2% June.

Unemployment report overview, U6 = 16.2%.

Be useful if you understood what U6 is, which I not only repeat the definition on the 1st link I calculate the raw total and yes that is how the BLS calculates. I not only read the details of the BLS, I also call them for missing info and statistic calculation specifics, even margin or error cumulative on sample size. I get it right when many in the major press get it wrong and the reason is I calculate often from the databases directly, check the numbers, run calculations on the data and continual check the p's and q's and yes it matches what the BLS publishes.

U6 is not 22%. Also, "not in the labor force" has segments, there is no "intentionally dropped out", there are marginally attached, which is a small number in comparison to the total of even U3.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

U6 20+%

The 20+% U6 number may refer to subsets of the U6 population. I have see and hear journalistic reports the African-American U6 number is over 20%. Also teen numbers.

Perhaps the writer ment to say "as high as 22%".

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

shadow stats

Roberts, along with Dylan Ratigan are quoting shadow stats. I have to go check how this is calculated at shadow stats but I believe some long term subset from "not in the labor force" is being added to U-6.

there is a huge segment of the population categorized as not in the labor force. This can be retired, stay at home moms, super rich not needing to work and also has hidden unemployed who have fallen off of the count.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

The 22% unemployment rate is

The 22% unemployment rate is calculated by taking the U6 number and then adding the long term unemployed discouraged workers which have not been counted since 1994. The site Shadowstats has an unemployment calculation that includes the long term discouraged which is listed as SGS. Check out the site www.shadowstats.com.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

The Consumer

A good start to work against all his crap would be to stop calling citezens "consumers", as in "The Federal Reserve can print money to rescue the crooked financial institutions, but it cannot rescue the American CITIZEN."

We are not consumers, we are tax-paying CITIZENS.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

US Government default.

Can someone elaborate on why the US Government can't default on its bonds because they're paid for with US currency? I don't understand that.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

bonds and money

I'm not sure what you mean. If you are thinking because the U.S. prints it's own money why not print some to pay bond holders, each $ has a value associated with it and each $ is itself an promissory note.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

Health Care

Of course single payer will lower costs. Ask yourself what value does a private health insurance company add? It's not healthcare, that's done by doctors and nurses in clinics and hospitals. Insurance companies merely collect money and pay the bills, while taking 20 to 33% off the top.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.