The Fed Loves the Shadow Banking System

This is a follow-up to In May, FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) changed an accounting rule that eliminated the exemption for Qualified Special Purpose Entities from balance sheet treatment. This rule would require financial conglomerates to show all of those special investment vehicles and other "off-balance sheet" investment vehicles they have been hiding. This change in effect would shed some light on the "shadow" banking system. FASB made this change in the interest of more transparency in financial reporting.

Of course, financial conglomerates don't like this because if would expose more of the "smoke and mirror" earnings. And guess who may be coming to the rescue of the financial conglomerates?

The Fed.

With regulator like the Fed, these financial conglomerates don't need friends. The Fed is uneasy about this rule change that will take effect in 2010:

The U.S. Federal Reserve has privately expressed concerns over new accounting rules that could force banks to move more assets onto their books, a person familiar with the Fed's thinking said on Friday.

That is right. The future Systemic Risk Regulator - the Fed - does not like transparency or the fact that toxic waste that has been stored off the balance may be hoisted on to financial conglomerates balance sheets. See, it is OK if financial conglomerates and the Fed know that financial conglomerates own toxic waste but it is not OK for us to know.

Why is the Fed uneasy about this change? Because that would upset the status-quo. Financial conglomerates, in order to support their size, need higher and higher returns but higher returns come with more risk taking. But obviously, they have a problem with risk and may need a bailout in the future. So, the next time they need a taxpayer bailout they could continue to make it look like they were providing a valuable service to our economy by intermediating and facilitating credit and are essential to the health of our economy. It is all about preserving the "House of Cards" for the financial oligarchy.

Subject Meta: 

Forum Categories: 

The Fed should not be the global regulator

period. That is the U.S. government and Congress's job.

The financial oligarchy is seemingly alive and well, now fat on taxpayer money.

How's that for a Thomas Paine type of statement?

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

And like with when I read Thomas Paine

I disagree. We need to get rid of the entire idea of the FED. It worked ok for small scale, but like most economic systems, it fails on the large scale.

We need an antitrust lawsuit against the FED, and we need to replace it with 50 individual state-controlled banks who can each adjust their own rates of check clearance to effectively get around Section 1 Article 10 bans on state tariffs and states coining money.
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.

You must have Javascript enabled to use this form.

-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.