ABC's 'The View' In Spotlight After Jimmy Kimmel Suspended, Says FCC Chairman

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr said in an interview that ABC’s “The View” could be investigated after Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show, “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”, was suspended earlier this week over remarks he made about the late Charlie Kirk.

“I would assume you could make the argument that ‘The View’ is a bona fide news show, but I’m not so sure about that,” Carr said on “The Scott Jennings Radio Show” on Sept. 18.

“And I think it’s worthwhile to have the FCC look into whether ‘The View’ and some of the programs that you have still qualify as bona fide news programs and therefore exempt from the equal opportunity regime that Congress has put in place.”

“The View,” a daytime talk show, is hosted by Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Sunny Hostin, Sara Haines, Alyssa Farah Griffin, and Ana Navarro.

ABC suspended “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” indefinitely after a group of ABC-affiliated stations said it would not air the show following comments Kimmel made about the assassination of Kirk, a conservative influencer, during an episode earlier this week.

Kimmel appeared to suggest that the suspected assassin, Tyler Robinson, was a supporter of President Donald Trump and the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

Prosecutors have said that Robinson allegedly had left-wing and pro-transgender views.

Carr said that Kimmel was attempting to mislead the public with his on-air statements.

“The issue that arose here, where lots and lots of people were upset, was not a joke,” Carr told CNBC on Thursday.

“It was appearing to directly mislead the American public about a significant fact.”

Under the FCC’s jurisdiction, ABC, CBS, and NBC have special requirements to “operate within the public interest,” Carr said on Sept. 17.

“Broadcasters are different than any other form of communication.”

Carr said his agency had a strong case for holding Kimmel, ABC, and network parent Walt Disney Co. accountable for spreading false information.

Prominent Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, were critical of Kimmel being suspended by ABC and other broadcasters.

“After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like,” Obama said in a post on X.

President Donald Trump said that Kimmel was removed partially because of a “lack of talent,” along with his recent comments on Kirk.

“Kimmel is not a talented person; he has very bad ratings more than anything else, and they should have fired him a long time ago,” Trump said during a joint news conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the UK on Sept. 18.

“You can call that free speech or not—he was fired for lack of talent.”

In posts on Truth Social this year, including one last month, Trump also suggested that the FCC go after the broadcasting licenses held by ABC and NBC.

Kimmel has not issued a public statement on his suspension, and it’s unclear whether he will return to the show he’s hosted since May 2002.

The Epoch Times has contacted ABC for comment.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:40

ABC's 'The View' In Spotlight After Jimmy Kimmel Suspended, Says FCC Chairman

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr said in an interview that ABC’s “The View” could be investigated after Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show, “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”, was suspended earlier this week over remarks he made about the late Charlie Kirk.

“I would assume you could make the argument that ‘The View’ is a bona fide news show, but I’m not so sure about that,” Carr said on “The Scott Jennings Radio Show” on Sept. 18.

“And I think it’s worthwhile to have the FCC look into whether ‘The View’ and some of the programs that you have still qualify as bona fide news programs and therefore exempt from the equal opportunity regime that Congress has put in place.”

“The View,” a daytime talk show, is hosted by Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Sunny Hostin, Sara Haines, Alyssa Farah Griffin, and Ana Navarro.

ABC suspended “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” indefinitely after a group of ABC-affiliated stations said it would not air the show following comments Kimmel made about the assassination of Kirk, a conservative influencer, during an episode earlier this week.

Kimmel appeared to suggest that the suspected assassin, Tyler Robinson, was a supporter of President Donald Trump and the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

Prosecutors have said that Robinson allegedly had left-wing and pro-transgender views.

Carr said that Kimmel was attempting to mislead the public with his on-air statements.

“The issue that arose here, where lots and lots of people were upset, was not a joke,” Carr told CNBC on Thursday.

“It was appearing to directly mislead the American public about a significant fact.”

Under the FCC’s jurisdiction, ABC, CBS, and NBC have special requirements to “operate within the public interest,” Carr said on Sept. 17.

“Broadcasters are different than any other form of communication.”

Carr said his agency had a strong case for holding Kimmel, ABC, and network parent Walt Disney Co. accountable for spreading false information.

Prominent Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, were critical of Kimmel being suspended by ABC and other broadcasters.

“After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like,” Obama said in a post on X.

President Donald Trump said that Kimmel was removed partially because of a “lack of talent,” along with his recent comments on Kirk.

“Kimmel is not a talented person; he has very bad ratings more than anything else, and they should have fired him a long time ago,” Trump said during a joint news conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in the UK on Sept. 18.

“You can call that free speech or not—he was fired for lack of talent.”

In posts on Truth Social this year, including one last month, Trump also suggested that the FCC go after the broadcasting licenses held by ABC and NBC.

Kimmel has not issued a public statement on his suspension, and it’s unclear whether he will return to the show he’s hosted since May 2002.

The Epoch Times has contacted ABC for comment.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:40

Inside The CIA Unit Nobody Dares Talk About

In an eye-opening interview, former CIA officer turned whistleblower John Kiriakou pulled back the curtain on the agency's most elite fighting units, revealing how the United States’ intelligence agencies transformed overnight into a lethal force dedicated to hunting down radical Islamic terrorists after the September 11th terror attacks.

Speaking with host Dalton Fischer, Kiriakou delivered a no-nonsense account of CIA's most classified operators, the legendary Ground Branch warriors, Special Activities Division (SAD), and Counterterrorism Center (CTC), elite units filled with the U.S.’s finest Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, and Delta Force operators.

"These aren't your typical government bureaucrats," Kiriakou explained. "These are battle-tested heroes from our most elite military units, SEALs, Rangers, Delta Force, recruited because they have the skills and courage to do what others can't."

After 9/11, these elite soldiers were quickly brought into the CIA fold, many on loan from the military before becoming permanent assets in divisions like Global Services, Special Activities Division, and the hard-hitting Counterterrorism Center. Their mission? Simple and vital: eliminate threats to American lives and freedom (and whatever the fuck else the CIA has them doing). 

"What they do is so classified that even though everybody in the office knows what they're up to, nobody talks about it," Kiriakou revealed, describing the iron-clad secrecy surrounding these operations. Their job, the former CIA officer explained without hesitation, is "to neutralize anybody who poses a threat to the United States, its citizens, or its installations.”

While praising the critical importance of eliminating high-value terrorist targets like Osama bin Laden to protect American families, Kiriakou didn't shy away from addressing the tough questions about oversight and accountability.

"Mistakes happen in the fog of war," Kiriakou acknowledged, referencing troubling cases where intelligence errors led to innocent people being detained. "We're not lawless vigilantes. As American government officials, we're bound by the Constitution. That's what separates us from our enemies and makes America the beacon of freedom in the world.”

Kiriakou pinpointed the exact moment America's intelligence community transformed into a fighting force.

"The day after 9/11,” Kiriakou told Fischer, vividly recalling the pivotal moment when Cofer Black, then head of the Counterterrorism Center, stood before his team and declared the new reality.

"Today, we're at war, and we're all going to have to fight. Not all of us are going to come home," Black announced to a silent room, marking the beginning of the U.S.’s years-long campaign against al-Qaeda.

By Christmas 2001, Kiriakou explained that al-Qaeda’s core operations in Afghanistan was virtually destroyed, with only 25 active members remaining according to Senate intelligence.

Before 9/11, the Special Activities Division operated in the shadows within the CIA's Directorate of Operations, conducting missions that were rarely discussed even within the agency itself. After the attacks, the Counterterrorism Center rapidly established its own special activities group, primarily composed of loaned military personnel focused on hunting down terrorists plotting against America.

The elite CIA units regularly undertake extraordinarily dangerous missions, including parachuting into hostile territory, conducting high-risk extractions in terrorist strongholds like Benghazi, Khartoum, and Karachi.

"It's extremely dangerous work,” Kiriakou said, noting that many fallen heroes are honored with anonymous stars on the CIA's Wall of Honor, their ultimate sacrifice known only to God and country.

The post-9/11 atmosphere at the Counterterrorism Center reflected America's new war footing, with office areas nicknamed "Bin Laden Boulevard" and "Hezbollah Highway."

Kiriakou also shed light on the Global Response Staff (GRS), elite security professionals whose job is literally to put their lives on the line for other Americans. Created to protect case officers operating in the world's most dangerous locations. "Your job is to throw your body in front of the other guy so he doesn't get killed,” he told Fischer.

Kiriakou is a former CIA officer who became a prominent whistleblower after exposing the agency's use of torture in interrogations following 9/11. He served in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and was involved in the capture of high-value terrorist targets, including Abu Zubaydah in Pakistan in 2002. Kiriakou made headlines when he publicly confirmed the CIA's use of waterboarding and other enhanced interrogation techniques, becoming the first former CIA officer to openly discuss the agency's torture program. His revelations led to his prosecution under the Espionage Act, and he served nearly two years in federal prison for allegedly revealing the identity of a covert CIA officer.

The 20-year war in Afghanistan stands as one of the U.S.'s most devastating foreign policy failures, costing taxpayers over $2 trillion and resulting in the deaths of 243,000 people across Afghanistan and Pakistan since 2001, according to Brown University's Costs of War Project. While the U.S. achieved the initial mission of dismantling al-Qaeda and removing the Taliban government after 9/11, the mission tragically expanded into a nation-building disaster that squandered American blood and treasure. Over 2,400 American servicemembers made the ultimate sacrifice, all for a mission that ended in humiliating defeat when the Taliban reclaimed power in mere days following then-President Joe Biden's catastrophic withdrawal in August 2021. The collapse exposed how two decades of military presence, billions spent training Afghan forces, and countless American lives lost failed to create the stable democracy our leaders promised, leaving many veterans asking whether their sacrifice was in vain.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:20

Inside The CIA Unit Nobody Dares Talk About

In an eye-opening interview, former CIA officer turned whistleblower John Kiriakou pulled back the curtain on the agency's most elite fighting units, revealing how the United States’ intelligence agencies transformed overnight into a lethal force dedicated to hunting down radical Islamic terrorists after the September 11th terror attacks.

Speaking with host Dalton Fischer, Kiriakou delivered a no-nonsense account of CIA's most classified operators, the legendary Ground Branch warriors, Special Activities Division (SAD), and Counterterrorism Center (CTC), elite units filled with the U.S.’s finest Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, and Delta Force operators.

"These aren't your typical government bureaucrats," Kiriakou explained. "These are battle-tested heroes from our most elite military units, SEALs, Rangers, Delta Force, recruited because they have the skills and courage to do what others can't."

After 9/11, these elite soldiers were quickly brought into the CIA fold, many on loan from the military before becoming permanent assets in divisions like Global Services, Special Activities Division, and the hard-hitting Counterterrorism Center. Their mission? Simple and vital: eliminate threats to American lives and freedom (and whatever the fuck else the CIA has them doing). 

"What they do is so classified that even though everybody in the office knows what they're up to, nobody talks about it," Kiriakou revealed, describing the iron-clad secrecy surrounding these operations. Their job, the former CIA officer explained without hesitation, is "to neutralize anybody who poses a threat to the United States, its citizens, or its installations.”

While praising the critical importance of eliminating high-value terrorist targets like Osama bin Laden to protect American families, Kiriakou didn't shy away from addressing the tough questions about oversight and accountability.

"Mistakes happen in the fog of war," Kiriakou acknowledged, referencing troubling cases where intelligence errors led to innocent people being detained. "We're not lawless vigilantes. As American government officials, we're bound by the Constitution. That's what separates us from our enemies and makes America the beacon of freedom in the world.”

Kiriakou pinpointed the exact moment America's intelligence community transformed into a fighting force.

"The day after 9/11,” Kiriakou told Fischer, vividly recalling the pivotal moment when Cofer Black, then head of the Counterterrorism Center, stood before his team and declared the new reality.

"Today, we're at war, and we're all going to have to fight. Not all of us are going to come home," Black announced to a silent room, marking the beginning of the U.S.’s years-long campaign against al-Qaeda.

By Christmas 2001, Kiriakou explained that al-Qaeda’s core operations in Afghanistan was virtually destroyed, with only 25 active members remaining according to Senate intelligence.

Before 9/11, the Special Activities Division operated in the shadows within the CIA's Directorate of Operations, conducting missions that were rarely discussed even within the agency itself. After the attacks, the Counterterrorism Center rapidly established its own special activities group, primarily composed of loaned military personnel focused on hunting down terrorists plotting against America.

The elite CIA units regularly undertake extraordinarily dangerous missions, including parachuting into hostile territory, conducting high-risk extractions in terrorist strongholds like Benghazi, Khartoum, and Karachi.

"It's extremely dangerous work,” Kiriakou said, noting that many fallen heroes are honored with anonymous stars on the CIA's Wall of Honor, their ultimate sacrifice known only to God and country.

The post-9/11 atmosphere at the Counterterrorism Center reflected America's new war footing, with office areas nicknamed "Bin Laden Boulevard" and "Hezbollah Highway."

Kiriakou also shed light on the Global Response Staff (GRS), elite security professionals whose job is literally to put their lives on the line for other Americans. Created to protect case officers operating in the world's most dangerous locations. "Your job is to throw your body in front of the other guy so he doesn't get killed,” he told Fischer.

Kiriakou is a former CIA officer who became a prominent whistleblower after exposing the agency's use of torture in interrogations following 9/11. He served in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and was involved in the capture of high-value terrorist targets, including Abu Zubaydah in Pakistan in 2002. Kiriakou made headlines when he publicly confirmed the CIA's use of waterboarding and other enhanced interrogation techniques, becoming the first former CIA officer to openly discuss the agency's torture program. His revelations led to his prosecution under the Espionage Act, and he served nearly two years in federal prison for allegedly revealing the identity of a covert CIA officer.

The 20-year war in Afghanistan stands as one of the U.S.'s most devastating foreign policy failures, costing taxpayers over $2 trillion and resulting in the deaths of 243,000 people across Afghanistan and Pakistan since 2001, according to Brown University's Costs of War Project. While the U.S. achieved the initial mission of dismantling al-Qaeda and removing the Taliban government after 9/11, the mission tragically expanded into a nation-building disaster that squandered American blood and treasure. Over 2,400 American servicemembers made the ultimate sacrifice, all for a mission that ended in humiliating defeat when the Taliban reclaimed power in mere days following then-President Joe Biden's catastrophic withdrawal in August 2021. The collapse exposed how two decades of military presence, billions spent training Afghan forces, and countless American lives lost failed to create the stable democracy our leaders promised, leaving many veterans asking whether their sacrifice was in vain.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:20

"Free DC!": Screamfest During House Hearing As Tlaib Accuses Trump Admin Of 'Fascist Takeover'

Authored by Debra Heine via American Greatness,

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) described the Trump administration’s crackdown on crime in Washington D.C. as a “fascist takeover” during an unhinged diatribe in the House of Representatives Thursday, prompting a Republican member to call her “radical” and “insane.”

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing titled “Oversight of the District of Columbia” to discuss President Trump’s recent efforts to improve public safety in the nation’s capital.

Witnesses included D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, and gun control advocate Gregory Jackson, Jr.

Tlaib made clear in her remarks that she was not a fan of Trump’s decision to mobilize the national guard and take control of the Metropolitan Police Department to combat the rampant crime and homelessness plaguing D.C.

“We can’t be passive right now. It’s really important that we stand up against this fascist takeover,” Tlaib said.

She added defensively, “that’s not a bad word! It’s a fact here in D.C. and across the country.”

The congresswoman went on to suggest that any mention of the city’s crime issues was insincere and off-base.

“It is so incredibly important Mr. Chair that this committee does not allow rhetoric that defames or paints Washington D.C. in a way that you all really haven’t seen, she said. “You’re just reading it or something of off …”

At this point Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) interjected to ask Tlaib to yield to answer a question.

“No, I don’t yield, I don’t even have time,” the congresswoman shot back.

“Your time’s expired,” Donalds informed her.

But Tlaib continued her rant.

“You all live here and you’re not telling people the beautiful parts that we do see in our nation’s capital,” she said.

Donald’s broke in again to say he objected to Tlaib referring to him and his colleagues as if they were from “the Third Reich.”

“This is insane!” he exclaimed. “Do I look like a member of the Third Reich to you Miss Tlaib?” he asked.

The congresswoman raised her voice, shrilly screaming in response: “You’re the one who … No! … That’s unethical!”

As the Michigan Democrat continued to fulminate, Donalds spoke over her, saying  “I think it’s radical and I think it’s insane and I don’t respect anything that you said. To say something like that about myself and my colleagues is way out of line!”

“You hold yourself accountable before you talk about Washington D.C.!”  Tlaib bellowed in response.

“Hold your own self accountable, how about that?” Donalds shot back. “Hold your own self accountable.”

“Free D.C., Free D.C.!” Tlaib chanted, echoing the far-left street agitators who had been bused into the capital to protest Trump’s crackdown on crime.

Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) finally took control and gave the floor to Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.).

In his opening statement, Comer credited the president with setting “a strong example of how smart-on-crime policies protect communities.”

The chairman noted that the Committee recently passed fourteen key pieces of legislation aimed at restoring public safety, and urged his colleagues to continue building on the progress already achieved in D.C.

Comer said that “since Trump mobilized the national guard and took control of the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime has decreased 39 percent, robberies are down 57 percent, and car jackings are down 75 percent.”

Over 2,300 people have been arrested. Nearly 950 illegal aliens have been detained by ICE, including 20 gang members from violent foreign terrorist organizations.

Sex offenders have been taken off the streets.

Major drug trafficking operations have been foiled.

Authorities thwarted a planned school shooting, cleared 50 illegal tent encampments, and rescued seven missing children.

And D.C. went without a homicide for 13 days.

Prior to Trump’s crackdown on crime, Washington, D.C. was suffering from soaring crime rates, as high as the violent 1990s, Comer said.

“President Trump’s operation was a resounding success and a shining example of how smart-on-crime policies can keep the residents of and visitors to our nation’s capital safe,” the chairman declared.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:00

"Free DC!": Screamfest During House Hearing As Tlaib Accuses Trump Admin Of 'Fascist Takeover'

Authored by Debra Heine via American Greatness,

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) described the Trump administration’s crackdown on crime in Washington D.C. as a “fascist takeover” during an unhinged diatribe in the House of Representatives Thursday, prompting a Republican member to call her “radical” and “insane.”

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing titled “Oversight of the District of Columbia” to discuss President Trump’s recent efforts to improve public safety in the nation’s capital.

Witnesses included D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, and gun control advocate Gregory Jackson, Jr.

Tlaib made clear in her remarks that she was not a fan of Trump’s decision to mobilize the national guard and take control of the Metropolitan Police Department to combat the rampant crime and homelessness plaguing D.C.

“We can’t be passive right now. It’s really important that we stand up against this fascist takeover,” Tlaib said.

She added defensively, “that’s not a bad word! It’s a fact here in D.C. and across the country.”

The congresswoman went on to suggest that any mention of the city’s crime issues was insincere and off-base.

“It is so incredibly important Mr. Chair that this committee does not allow rhetoric that defames or paints Washington D.C. in a way that you all really haven’t seen, she said. “You’re just reading it or something of off …”

At this point Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) interjected to ask Tlaib to yield to answer a question.

“No, I don’t yield, I don’t even have time,” the congresswoman shot back.

“Your time’s expired,” Donalds informed her.

But Tlaib continued her rant.

“You all live here and you’re not telling people the beautiful parts that we do see in our nation’s capital,” she said.

Donald’s broke in again to say he objected to Tlaib referring to him and his colleagues as if they were from “the Third Reich.”

“This is insane!” he exclaimed. “Do I look like a member of the Third Reich to you Miss Tlaib?” he asked.

The congresswoman raised her voice, shrilly screaming in response: “You’re the one who … No! … That’s unethical!”

As the Michigan Democrat continued to fulminate, Donalds spoke over her, saying  “I think it’s radical and I think it’s insane and I don’t respect anything that you said. To say something like that about myself and my colleagues is way out of line!”

“You hold yourself accountable before you talk about Washington D.C.!”  Tlaib bellowed in response.

“Hold your own self accountable, how about that?” Donalds shot back. “Hold your own self accountable.”

“Free D.C., Free D.C.!” Tlaib chanted, echoing the far-left street agitators who had been bused into the capital to protest Trump’s crackdown on crime.

Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) finally took control and gave the floor to Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.).

In his opening statement, Comer credited the president with setting “a strong example of how smart-on-crime policies protect communities.”

The chairman noted that the Committee recently passed fourteen key pieces of legislation aimed at restoring public safety, and urged his colleagues to continue building on the progress already achieved in D.C.

Comer said that “since Trump mobilized the national guard and took control of the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime has decreased 39 percent, robberies are down 57 percent, and car jackings are down 75 percent.”

Over 2,300 people have been arrested. Nearly 950 illegal aliens have been detained by ICE, including 20 gang members from violent foreign terrorist organizations.

Sex offenders have been taken off the streets.

Major drug trafficking operations have been foiled.

Authorities thwarted a planned school shooting, cleared 50 illegal tent encampments, and rescued seven missing children.

And D.C. went without a homicide for 13 days.

Prior to Trump’s crackdown on crime, Washington, D.C. was suffering from soaring crime rates, as high as the violent 1990s, Comer said.

“President Trump’s operation was a resounding success and a shining example of how smart-on-crime policies can keep the residents of and visitors to our nation’s capital safe,” the chairman declared.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:00

Baltimore's Decay Accelerates As Kevin Plank's Billion-Dollar Microcity Turns Into "Ghost Town"

Under Armour founder Kevin Plank and his brother Scott Plank sold their ownership interest in a luxury hotel tucked into Baltimore's historic Fells Point neighborhood this week. The sale comes as UA's turnaround plan sputters, its much-hyped micro-city remains half-empty, and Plank continues, or at least attempts to offload assets. Why the Planks poured so much money into a city run by incompetent Democrats - many of them considered far-left activists - remains puzzling, as Baltimore has descended over the years into what President Trump has called a "hellhole."

The Baltimore Sun reports the Plank brothers sold their ownership stake in the Pendry hotel to Montage International, a California-based hospitality management company, on Wednesday. They spent $60 million to renovate and restore the building, transforming it into what is now called the Sagamore Pendry Baltimore hotel. 

A major problem for the luxury hotel, as The Sun asks: Amid Sagamore Pendry sale by Kevin Plank, can luxury hotels thrive in Baltimore? 

Certainly a great question, given that the far-left activists running Baltimore City have pushed a decade of failed criminal justice reforms that backfired and fueled a violent crime wave. The result is unmistakable: a population collapse to 100-year lows.

... in other words, the largest population exodus in a generation. The city could lose its "major city" status if the population hemorrhage continues.

Why the Planks poured tens of millions - if not more - into Baltimore seems like another troubling bet. Perhaps the explanation lies in their origin story, which began in the metro area, where they sold UA tees out of a car at youth lacrosse games and through the retail chain Lax World.

UA's Turnaround plan sputtering:

• Under Armour Shares Crash As Kevin Plank's Turnaround Plan Hits Wall 

And this.

• Kevin Plank's Race Farm Listed For $22 Million Amid Under Armour Troubles

• Inside World Of High-Net-Worth Lending: Kevin Plank Pledges Georgetown Home For $15M Commercial Loan

Plus this. 

• "Billion-Dollar Ghost Town" Surrounds Under Armor Headquarters

UA is a mess. Baltimore is a mess. Maryland is a mess. Time for a reset of politics in the state controlled by radical leftists.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 16:40

Baltimore's Decay Accelerates As Kevin Plank's Billion-Dollar Microcity Turns Into "Ghost Town"

Under Armour founder Kevin Plank and his brother Scott Plank sold their ownership interest in a luxury hotel tucked into Baltimore's historic Fells Point neighborhood this week. The sale comes as UA's turnaround plan sputters, its much-hyped micro-city remains half-empty, and Plank continues, or at least attempts to offload assets. Why the Planks poured so much money into a city run by incompetent Democrats - many of them considered far-left activists - remains puzzling, as Baltimore has descended over the years into what President Trump has called a "hellhole."

The Baltimore Sun reports the Plank brothers sold their ownership stake in the Pendry hotel to Montage International, a California-based hospitality management company, on Wednesday. They spent $60 million to renovate and restore the building, transforming it into what is now called the Sagamore Pendry Baltimore hotel. 

A major problem for the luxury hotel, as The Sun asks: Amid Sagamore Pendry sale by Kevin Plank, can luxury hotels thrive in Baltimore? 

Certainly a great question, given that the far-left activists running Baltimore City have pushed a decade of failed criminal justice reforms that backfired and fueled a violent crime wave. The result is unmistakable: a population collapse to 100-year lows.

... in other words, the largest population exodus in a generation. The city could lose its "major city" status if the population hemorrhage continues.

Why the Planks poured tens of millions - if not more - into Baltimore seems like another troubling bet. Perhaps the explanation lies in their origin story, which began in the metro area, where they sold UA tees out of a car at youth lacrosse games and through the retail chain Lax World.

UA's Turnaround plan sputtering:

• Under Armour Shares Crash As Kevin Plank's Turnaround Plan Hits Wall 

And this.

• Kevin Plank's Race Farm Listed For $22 Million Amid Under Armour Troubles

• Inside World Of High-Net-Worth Lending: Kevin Plank Pledges Georgetown Home For $15M Commercial Loan

Plus this. 

• "Billion-Dollar Ghost Town" Surrounds Under Armor Headquarters

UA is a mess. Baltimore is a mess. Maryland is a mess. Time for a reset of politics in the state controlled by radical leftists.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 16:40

"At This Point, Nothing Will Save The Democratic Party From Itself..."

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

"You have no idea the fire you have ignited."

- Erika Kirk

He was about as fine a young man as you could have dreamed up in a country so busy disgracing itself, Jesus-like in quality, if not in exact manner. Jesus, after all, was not a family man. But then there was nothing supernatural about Charlie Kirk. He was vividly of this time and place on earth. Now, in death, you can imagine him up on a mural in the post office. They’ve gone and turned him into legend, like Davy Crockett, Joseph Smith, Abe Lincoln. Yeah, it goes that deep.

The Woke-Jacobin Left broke into a happy-dance when they heard the news, and I bet 90-percent of them didn’t even know what Charlie was about, except that their minders had painted a bullseye on him and somebody hit it. They have forgotten what their country is about, too. They have unwittingly acted-out Biblical-grade wickedness. Jimmy Kimmel didn’t just tell a bad joke about the president — “This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish" — he made a Judas of himself. He demonstrated exactly what it means to betray whatever remains of goodness in this land.

You are at a loss to understand how bad it got, years of officially enforced insanity, absurdities jammed down your craw, treasonous mischief, vile abuses under color-of-law (Tina Peters still rots in jail in Colorado!), and, lately, gunning down whoever stands in their way. You look at an old, established political party and you begin to see actual demons. You understand that destroying the country might not be enough for them.

At this point, nothing will save the Democratic Party from itself. It will not fade quietly into irrelevance like the Whigs did in the 1850s. No, you are witnessing something more like spontaneous combustion, a conflagration of the vicious and unholy.

If you happened to watch Kash Patel in the Senate Judiciary Committee the other day going at Adam Schiff, what you saw was an actual exorcism.

Mr. Patel said, “You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate. You are a disgrace to this institution and an utter coward. You continue to lie from your perch and put on a show so you can go raise money for your charades. You are a political buffoon at best! I challenge you to say anything credible to the truth. Go ahead and run to the cameras where you wanna go now!"

He might as well have just said: "I cast you out, unclean spirit, along with every satanic power of the enemy, every specter from hell, and all your fell companions. . . .” In the process, Mr. Patel reminded Senator Schiff that he is Director of the FBI now and, well. . . things have changed. Perhaps other Senators who have trafficked in sedition and malicious perfidy — say, Mark Warner on the Intel Committee — viewed these goings-on with a twinge of dread for what is coming.

Notice that no one on the Judiciary Committee dared move to hold Mr. Patel in contempt, because what he said is self-evidently true, and they all know it. Senator Schiff is, of course, already under investigation for mortgage fraud, which is inconvenient enough, but before long he will have to answer graver charges for offenses against the nation, along with many co-conspirators in and out of office. His over-speaking the witness (Mr. Patel) in committee the other day was the sort of climactic mummery you see in movies when the iniquitous are brought low in an official proceeding — think the babbling Bryan character in Inherit the Wind or Captain Queeg in the Caine Mutiny Court-Martial. Schiff knows he is cooked and Mr. Patel just flambéed him.

If Mr. Trump had any qualms about turning the full force of the law on this party and its demonic confederates in government and the old news media, then you can safely assume that after Charlie Kirk’s murder every lever of power will be used to get them all into courtrooms under fair and correct proceedings with the basic aim of laying out the truth of what has happened to our country, so that everyone can see what it was.

By the way, and in case you missed it, Associate Deputy Attorney General Ed Martin, on or about September 5, visited Tina Peters in her cell in the Colorado State Prison at Pueblo. Peters (who turns 70 today), the former Mesa County Clerk convicted in 2024 of nine felony counts related to a security breach of voting equipment (stemming from efforts to "prove" 2020 election fraud claims), was sentenced to nine years in prison. The DOJ has filed a “review” of her conviction in federal court. I wouldn’t want to be Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State, who spearheaded Tina Peter’s prosecution for daring to voice concern over election fraud.

Then, just this week, the same Ed Martin paid a call to the Fulton County, GA, election headquarters to initiate federal grand jury proceedings to access 148,000 ballots held under seal and unexamined in a county warehouse since the 2020 election. The ballots have long been suspected of irregularities and possible fraud. “Joe Biden” won the state by 11,799 votes out of 5,017,000 cast (a 0.23% plurality), and thus the national election — as did both of Georgia’s Democratic senators, Jon Ossof and Raphael Warnock.

The post Charlie Kirk America is a new reality. Prepare accordingly.

*  *  *

Reserve your order by Sunday night for Monday shipping. Free shipping from now until Sept. 28. Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 16:20

"At This Point, Nothing Will Save The Democratic Party From Itself..."

Authored by James Howard Kunstler,

"You have no idea the fire you have ignited."

- Erika Kirk

He was about as fine a young man as you could have dreamed up in a country so busy disgracing itself, Jesus-like in quality, if not in exact manner. Jesus, after all, was not a family man. But then there was nothing supernatural about Charlie Kirk. He was vividly of this time and place on earth. Now, in death, you can imagine him up on a mural in the post office. They’ve gone and turned him into legend, like Davy Crockett, Joseph Smith, Abe Lincoln. Yeah, it goes that deep.

The Woke-Jacobin Left broke into a happy-dance when they heard the news, and I bet 90-percent of them didn’t even know what Charlie was about, except that their minders had painted a bullseye on him and somebody hit it. They have forgotten what their country is about, too. They have unwittingly acted-out Biblical-grade wickedness. Jimmy Kimmel didn’t just tell a bad joke about the president — “This is how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish" — he made a Judas of himself. He demonstrated exactly what it means to betray whatever remains of goodness in this land.

You are at a loss to understand how bad it got, years of officially enforced insanity, absurdities jammed down your craw, treasonous mischief, vile abuses under color-of-law (Tina Peters still rots in jail in Colorado!), and, lately, gunning down whoever stands in their way. You look at an old, established political party and you begin to see actual demons. You understand that destroying the country might not be enough for them.

At this point, nothing will save the Democratic Party from itself. It will not fade quietly into irrelevance like the Whigs did in the 1850s. No, you are witnessing something more like spontaneous combustion, a conflagration of the vicious and unholy.

If you happened to watch Kash Patel in the Senate Judiciary Committee the other day going at Adam Schiff, what you saw was an actual exorcism.

Mr. Patel said, “You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate. You are a disgrace to this institution and an utter coward. You continue to lie from your perch and put on a show so you can go raise money for your charades. You are a political buffoon at best! I challenge you to say anything credible to the truth. Go ahead and run to the cameras where you wanna go now!"

He might as well have just said: "I cast you out, unclean spirit, along with every satanic power of the enemy, every specter from hell, and all your fell companions. . . .” In the process, Mr. Patel reminded Senator Schiff that he is Director of the FBI now and, well. . . things have changed. Perhaps other Senators who have trafficked in sedition and malicious perfidy — say, Mark Warner on the Intel Committee — viewed these goings-on with a twinge of dread for what is coming.

Notice that no one on the Judiciary Committee dared move to hold Mr. Patel in contempt, because what he said is self-evidently true, and they all know it. Senator Schiff is, of course, already under investigation for mortgage fraud, which is inconvenient enough, but before long he will have to answer graver charges for offenses against the nation, along with many co-conspirators in and out of office. His over-speaking the witness (Mr. Patel) in committee the other day was the sort of climactic mummery you see in movies when the iniquitous are brought low in an official proceeding — think the babbling Bryan character in Inherit the Wind or Captain Queeg in the Caine Mutiny Court-Martial. Schiff knows he is cooked and Mr. Patel just flambéed him.

If Mr. Trump had any qualms about turning the full force of the law on this party and its demonic confederates in government and the old news media, then you can safely assume that after Charlie Kirk’s murder every lever of power will be used to get them all into courtrooms under fair and correct proceedings with the basic aim of laying out the truth of what has happened to our country, so that everyone can see what it was.

By the way, and in case you missed it, Associate Deputy Attorney General Ed Martin, on or about September 5, visited Tina Peters in her cell in the Colorado State Prison at Pueblo. Peters (who turns 70 today), the former Mesa County Clerk convicted in 2024 of nine felony counts related to a security breach of voting equipment (stemming from efforts to "prove" 2020 election fraud claims), was sentenced to nine years in prison. The DOJ has filed a “review” of her conviction in federal court. I wouldn’t want to be Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State, who spearheaded Tina Peter’s prosecution for daring to voice concern over election fraud.

Then, just this week, the same Ed Martin paid a call to the Fulton County, GA, election headquarters to initiate federal grand jury proceedings to access 148,000 ballots held under seal and unexamined in a county warehouse since the 2020 election. The ballots have long been suspected of irregularities and possible fraud. “Joe Biden” won the state by 11,799 votes out of 5,017,000 cast (a 0.23% plurality), and thus the national election — as did both of Georgia’s Democratic senators, Jon Ossof and Raphael Warnock.

The post Charlie Kirk America is a new reality. Prepare accordingly.

*  *  *

Reserve your order by Sunday night for Monday shipping. Free shipping from now until Sept. 28. Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 16:20

ETF Just Happened

By Bas van Geffen, Senior Macro Strategist At Raboank

In a surprise decision, the Bank of Japan announced it would start to gradually sell its ETF holdings. The central bank plans to shrink its portfolio by ¥620 billion ($4.2 billion) per year. To emphasise how gradual of a pace that is, Governor Ueda recounted that “it would take more than 100 years” to fully unwind the central bank’s ETF holdings.

On top of that, two policymakers dissented from the decision to leave the policy rate unchanged today. They preferred to hike to 0.75% already, which puts a rate hike in October squarely on the table.

The shock announcement made for a bit of a rollercoaster ride for Japanese equities. The Nikkei 225 opened the trading day about one percent higher; tumbled 2.5% from those levels on the Bank’s announcement; and finally recovered some of those declines to end up 0.6% below yesterday’s close.

But there’s, perhaps, another interesting element to this decision: the central bank decided to reduce its ETF holdings, rather than speeding up its exit from the sovereign bond market – that is, more than the tapering of JGB purchases it had announced in June. Both programmes will need to be right-sized as part of policy normalisation, but perhaps the recent pressure on global long-term bond yields –and particularly JGBs– was a consideration as well. Either way, the Japanese curve is twist flattening on the hawkish decision.

The UK monetary policy decision made less waves. Yesterday, the Bank of England decided to keep its policy rate unchanged at 4.00%, with a familiar split vote. The usual two suspects voted in favour of another 25bp cut. That, along with the policy statement, affirms our view that there is still a bias toward easing in the monetary policy committee, even though the bar for further rate cuts is rising. Policymakers are looking to cut further, but only when they get clearer evidence that the disinflationary process is continuing.

Yet, UK inflation data suggest that the disinflationary momentum is waning, and various metrics of underlying inflation remain sticky, and we don’t believe that the October inflation report will provide a very different picture. Therefore, we now expect the next rate cut to be delayed into early 2026, and we have revised our forecast for the terminal rate somewhat higher.

As our UK strategist notes, the Bank remaining on hold through Q4 also puts the emphasis on Chancellor Reeves’ Autumn budget. The Chancellor has the difficult task of plugging a roughly £50 billion fiscal gap.

Today’s data once again underscored the need to shore up the UK’s finances. Public sector net borrowing was much higher than expected in August: last month, the government borrowed £5.5 billion more than the Office for Budget Responsibility had forecast in March. And estimated borrowing in earlier months were revised up as well. Yields on longer-dated gilts are opening significantly higher – with sterling down against both dollar and euro, reflecting concerns about the sustainability of the UK’s finances.

In short, tax hikes are pretty much unavoidable. That will be a tough message to sell, as Labour is already trailing Reform in the polls. But investors require something more tangible than just rhetoric: they demand to see credible and substantial fiscal adjustments.

Given the hesitance amongst gilt investors, it is noteworthy that the Bank of England will shrink its sovereign bond holdings by £70 billion over the next year. That includes £21 billion in active sales, on top of the maturing bonds – an increase from this year’s pace. In an attempt to limit disruptions in longer-dated Gilts, the central bank will skew its sales towards shorter maturities.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 15:40

ETF Just Happened

By Bas van Geffen, Senior Macro Strategist At Raboank

In a surprise decision, the Bank of Japan announced it would start to gradually sell its ETF holdings. The central bank plans to shrink its portfolio by ¥620 billion ($4.2 billion) per year. To emphasise how gradual of a pace that is, Governor Ueda recounted that “it would take more than 100 years” to fully unwind the central bank’s ETF holdings.

On top of that, two policymakers dissented from the decision to leave the policy rate unchanged today. They preferred to hike to 0.75% already, which puts a rate hike in October squarely on the table.

The shock announcement made for a bit of a rollercoaster ride for Japanese equities. The Nikkei 225 opened the trading day about one percent higher; tumbled 2.5% from those levels on the Bank’s announcement; and finally recovered some of those declines to end up 0.6% below yesterday’s close.

But there’s, perhaps, another interesting element to this decision: the central bank decided to reduce its ETF holdings, rather than speeding up its exit from the sovereign bond market – that is, more than the tapering of JGB purchases it had announced in June. Both programmes will need to be right-sized as part of policy normalisation, but perhaps the recent pressure on global long-term bond yields –and particularly JGBs– was a consideration as well. Either way, the Japanese curve is twist flattening on the hawkish decision.

The UK monetary policy decision made less waves. Yesterday, the Bank of England decided to keep its policy rate unchanged at 4.00%, with a familiar split vote. The usual two suspects voted in favour of another 25bp cut. That, along with the policy statement, affirms our view that there is still a bias toward easing in the monetary policy committee, even though the bar for further rate cuts is rising. Policymakers are looking to cut further, but only when they get clearer evidence that the disinflationary process is continuing.

Yet, UK inflation data suggest that the disinflationary momentum is waning, and various metrics of underlying inflation remain sticky, and we don’t believe that the October inflation report will provide a very different picture. Therefore, we now expect the next rate cut to be delayed into early 2026, and we have revised our forecast for the terminal rate somewhat higher.

As our UK strategist notes, the Bank remaining on hold through Q4 also puts the emphasis on Chancellor Reeves’ Autumn budget. The Chancellor has the difficult task of plugging a roughly £50 billion fiscal gap.

Today’s data once again underscored the need to shore up the UK’s finances. Public sector net borrowing was much higher than expected in August: last month, the government borrowed £5.5 billion more than the Office for Budget Responsibility had forecast in March. And estimated borrowing in earlier months were revised up as well. Yields on longer-dated gilts are opening significantly higher – with sterling down against both dollar and euro, reflecting concerns about the sustainability of the UK’s finances.

In short, tax hikes are pretty much unavoidable. That will be a tough message to sell, as Labour is already trailing Reform in the polls. But investors require something more tangible than just rhetoric: they demand to see credible and substantial fiscal adjustments.

Given the hesitance amongst gilt investors, it is noteworthy that the Bank of England will shrink its sovereign bond holdings by £70 billion over the next year. That includes £21 billion in active sales, on top of the maturing bonds – an increase from this year’s pace. In an attempt to limit disruptions in longer-dated Gilts, the central bank will skew its sales towards shorter maturities.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 15:40

Trump To Slap H1-B Visas With $100,000 Fee; Infosys, Cognizant Plunge

Bad news for alien worker visa farms such as Infosys and Cognizant.

President Trump is expected to sign an order as soon as Friday that would extensively overhaul the H-1B visa program, requiring a $100,000 fee for applications in a bid to curb overuse, Bloomberg reported citing a White House official familiar with the matter.

Trump is set to sign a proclamation Friday, requiring the payment and asserting that abuse of the H-1B pathway has displaced US workers. The proclamation restricts entry under the H-1B program unless accompanied by the payment, which of course will make it so prohibitively expensive to hire foreign workers that only a handful such applications will be made. 

Think of it as a tariff on foreign labor. 

There's more: Trump will also order the Labor Secretary to undertake a rulemaking process to revise prevailing-wage levels for the H-1B program, a move intended to limit the use of visas to undercut wages that would otherwise be paid to American workers.

The move is the latest immigration reform by the Trump administration and will heavily affect the technology industry in particular, as it relies heavily on H-1Bs. The administration argues that the revisions will bring more certainty to legitimate filings under the program by weeding out abuses. 

A fact sheet published by the White House and set seen by Bloomberg News, claims that workers are being replaced with lower-paid foreign labor and called it a national security threat. The dynamic is suppressing wages and disincentivizing Americans from choosing careers in STEM fields, the White House said. 

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the $100,000 figure was in addition to, or inclusive of, existing fees that are much more modest. Fees directly tied to the H-1B visa application currently include a $215 fee to register for the lottery and a $780 fee for a Form I-129, which is a petition for a non-immigrant worker that is filed by an employer sponsor.

H-1B visas are awarded based on a lottery system, but Bloomberg News has reported previously that flaws in the system create loopholes that some employers exploit by flooding the lottery with entries.  Unlike large tech firms these companies often use the visa program to hire lower-paid workers — and do so indirectly, through staffing and outsourcing companies that capture about half of the 85,000 new visas allocated each year.

The administration’s policy shift unfolds alongside a wave of fee increases for work permits, asylum applications and humanitarian protections stipulated in the president’s tax bill, in a bid to raise revenue to pay for funding for new detention centers, hiring thousands of immigration agents, and expanding border wall construction.

News of the shocking fee sent shares of visa farms and foreign worker consultancies such as Infosys, Cognizant and Accenture tumbling.

 

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 15:20

Trump To Slap H1-B Visas With $100,000 Fee; Infosys, Cognizant Plunge

Bad news for alien worker visa farms such as Infosys and Cognizant.

President Trump is expected to sign an order as soon as Friday that would extensively overhaul the H-1B visa program, requiring a $100,000 fee for applications in a bid to curb overuse, Bloomberg reported citing a White House official familiar with the matter.

Trump is set to sign a proclamation Friday, requiring the payment and asserting that abuse of the H-1B pathway has displaced US workers. The proclamation restricts entry under the H-1B program unless accompanied by the payment, which of course will make it so prohibitively expensive to hire foreign workers that only a handful such applications will be made. 

Think of it as a tariff on foreign labor. 

There's more: Trump will also order the Labor Secretary to undertake a rulemaking process to revise prevailing-wage levels for the H-1B program, a move intended to limit the use of visas to undercut wages that would otherwise be paid to American workers.

The move is the latest immigration reform by the Trump administration and will heavily affect the technology industry in particular, as it relies heavily on H-1Bs. The administration argues that the revisions will bring more certainty to legitimate filings under the program by weeding out abuses. 

A fact sheet published by the White House and set seen by Bloomberg News, claims that workers are being replaced with lower-paid foreign labor and called it a national security threat. The dynamic is suppressing wages and disincentivizing Americans from choosing careers in STEM fields, the White House said. 

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the $100,000 figure was in addition to, or inclusive of, existing fees that are much more modest. Fees directly tied to the H-1B visa application currently include a $215 fee to register for the lottery and a $780 fee for a Form I-129, which is a petition for a non-immigrant worker that is filed by an employer sponsor.

H-1B visas are awarded based on a lottery system, but Bloomberg News has reported previously that flaws in the system create loopholes that some employers exploit by flooding the lottery with entries.  Unlike large tech firms these companies often use the visa program to hire lower-paid workers — and do so indirectly, through staffing and outsourcing companies that capture about half of the 85,000 new visas allocated each year.

The administration’s policy shift unfolds alongside a wave of fee increases for work permits, asylum applications and humanitarian protections stipulated in the president’s tax bill, in a bid to raise revenue to pay for funding for new detention centers, hiring thousands of immigration agents, and expanding border wall construction.

News of the shocking fee sent shares of visa farms and foreign worker consultancies such as Infosys, Cognizant and Accenture tumbling.

 

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 15:20

Several Russian Jets Breach Airspace Of NATO-Member Estonia

NATO member Estonia (since 2004) has fiercely condemned what it says is a "brazen" incident where Russian warplanes violated its airspace over the Gulf of Finland on Friday.

The Estonian foreign ministry described that three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets "entered Estonian airspace without permission and remained there for a total of 12 minutes."

A pair of Mikoyan MiG-31 Foxhounds, Russian MoD

The ministry quickly summoned Russian chargé d'affaires "to lodge a protest" - and simultaneously EU diplomat Kaja Kallas, who hails from the Baltic country and was the first female prime minister, blasted the incursion as "an extremely dangerous provocation".

Foreign Minister Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna went further to call it "unprecedentedly brazen" saying that--

"Russia's increasingly extensive testing of boundaries and growing aggressiveness must be met with a swift increase in political and economic pressure."

Reports in Estonian media claim that the jets turned off their transponders and 'went dark' during the incident, so as to not be tracked easily on radar.

This apparently isn't a first, as Russia has allegedly violated Estonia's airspace four times in 2025. Moscow likely isn't too 'concerned' over moments its military might breach the airspace of this tiny former Soviet satellite state in the Baltics.

But European leaders are using these increasing instances to push for an 'eastern flank' aerial defense shield protecting NATO.

Just last week the two largest eastern members of NATO said that Russian drones breached their airspace.

The Polish instance was the most serious, given Warsaw accused Russia of intentionally sending a 'wave' of drones - up to 19 - which resulted in its military urgently scrambling jets to track them.

Adobe Stock

Russia in response insisted that there was nothing deliberate about the drone breach, which it turns out involved 'decoy' drones commonly used over Ukraine to draw away air defense missiles.

The Kremlin says there are "no plans" to target Polish or NATO soil. But one of the drones may have made it as much as 40 miles into Polish territory, which is significant.

Romania also sent jets to track an apparently errant Russian drone's movements, and chose not to shoot it down, before it went back into Ukraine.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 14:40

Several Russian Jets Breach Airspace Of NATO-Member Estonia

NATO member Estonia (since 2004) has fiercely condemned what it says is a "brazen" incident where Russian warplanes violated its airspace over the Gulf of Finland on Friday.

The Estonian foreign ministry described that three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets "entered Estonian airspace without permission and remained there for a total of 12 minutes."

A pair of Mikoyan MiG-31 Foxhounds, Russian MoD

The ministry quickly summoned Russian chargé d'affaires "to lodge a protest" - and simultaneously EU diplomat Kaja Kallas, who hails from the Baltic country and was the first female prime minister, blasted the incursion as "an extremely dangerous provocation".

Foreign Minister Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna went further to call it "unprecedentedly brazen" saying that--

"Russia's increasingly extensive testing of boundaries and growing aggressiveness must be met with a swift increase in political and economic pressure."

Reports in Estonian media claim that the jets turned off their transponders and 'went dark' during the incident, so as to not be tracked easily on radar.

This apparently isn't a first, as Russia has allegedly violated Estonia's airspace four times in 2025. Moscow likely isn't too 'concerned' over moments its military might breach the airspace of this tiny former Soviet satellite state in the Baltics.

But European leaders are using these increasing instances to push for an 'eastern flank' aerial defense shield protecting NATO.

Just last week the two largest eastern members of NATO said that Russian drones breached their airspace.

The Polish instance was the most serious, given Warsaw accused Russia of intentionally sending a 'wave' of drones - up to 19 - which resulted in its military urgently scrambling jets to track them.

Adobe Stock

Russia in response insisted that there was nothing deliberate about the drone breach, which it turns out involved 'decoy' drones commonly used over Ukraine to draw away air defense missiles.

The Kremlin says there are "no plans" to target Polish or NATO soil. But one of the drones may have made it as much as 40 miles into Polish territory, which is significant.

Romania also sent jets to track an apparently errant Russian drone's movements, and chose not to shoot it down, before it went back into Ukraine.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 14:40

Stopgap Passes House, But Senate Dems Block Path

Senate Democrats blocked the Republican stopgap measure to keep the government funded until late November, after the House narrowly passed the measure earlier in the day.

The Senate vote was 44 in favor and 48 against, short of the 60 votes required. Notably, Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) were the only Republicans to vote against the measure, while Democrat Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) voted for it. Several Republicans were absent from the vote. 

The short-term stopgap (aka mini can kick) was pitched by Republicans as a temporary solution to buy time while they sort out comprehensive spending legislation for the fiscal year which begins Oct. 1, a common strategy on both sides of the aisle. The measure includes security funding for lawmakers and federal officials following the assassination of prominent conservative activist Charlie Kirk. 

The GOP measure would extend government funding at current levels through Nov. 21. It would provide $88 million in additional funds for the security of lawmakers, the executive branch and the judiciary, reflecting heightened anxiety about political violence following Kirk’s killing last week. It would allow the District of Columbia to spend its own taxpayer-provided funds after a March spending law blocked the city from spending about $1 billion of its own money.

If no deal is reached, funding would lapse after Sept. 30, prompting a partial government shutdown. -WSJ

Democrats, however, are demanding over $1 trillion in healthcare subsidies as the price of their support - including extending several 'enhanced' subsidies from the Affordable Care Act, along with the restoration of Medicaid funds.

"Republicans cannot expect that another take-it-or-leave-it extension of government funding that fails to address healthcare costs is going to cut it for the American people," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), adding "By trying to make this partisan, Donald Trump and Republicans are shutting the government down."

Republicans hit back, effectively saying that Democrats must be smoking crack at that counteroffer - and pointing out that Democrats have long supported short continuing resolutions (CRs) while full-year spending bills are assembled.

"There’s a place for partisanship—it shouldn’t get so far that you’re shutting down the government," said House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole (R-OK). 

Democrats had previously proposed an alternative CR that would fund the government through Oct. 31, and reverse hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid enacted under the GOP tax-and-spending legislation that's been rebranded as the "working families tax cut." 

The Democrat alternative would permanently extend some ACA subsidies that expire at the end of this year. 

While Leon's getting larger, shutdown odds are once again spiking. 

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 14:00

US Vetoes UN Resolution Urging Immediate Cease-Fire, Hostage Release In Gaza

Authored by Evgenia Filimianova via The Epoch Times,

The United States on Sept. 18 vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, the release of hostages held by the terrorist group Hamas, and the lifting of Israeli restrictions on humanitarian aid, blocking a measure backed by the other 14 members of the 15-nation body.

U.S. Deputy Middle East Envoy Morgan Ortagus said Washington could not support the resolution because it would have locked in a cease-fire with Hamas still in control of Gaza.

“The United States will never accept this. President Trump will never accept this. He has made clear, all 48 hostages must be released now,” she said. “This resolution also refuses to acknowledge and seeks to return to a failed system that has allowed Hamas to enrich and strengthen itself at the expense of civilians in need.”

There has been mounting international pressure on Israel, including by governments and aid groups, as the conflict approaches its two-year mark.

The resolution was introduced by Denmark on behalf of the council’s elected members.

Denmark’s representative to the U.N., Christina Markus Lassen, said the measure aimed to address what she described as a “humanitarian and human failure” in Gaza and “contribute to the end of this abhorrent war.” Lassen said that famine in Gaza has been confirmed.

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a U.N.-backed body, said in August that nearly 514,000 people in Gaza are experiencing famine, a claim Israel has rejected.

Ortagus said the resolution failed to “recognize the reality on the ground” and a “meaningful increase in the flow of humanitarian aid.” She said that U.N. data showed about 85 percent of aid sent to Gaza since May 19 had been intercepted, stressing that it must reach civilians in need rather than sustain Hamas.

Ortagus added that the U.N. and Security Council members should support the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and other mechanisms, which deliver aid to civilians while denying resources to Hamas.

Ahead of the vote, Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, said in a social media post that “resolutions against Israel will not free the hostages or bring security.”

“Israel will continue to fight Hamas and protect its citizens, even if the Security Council prefers to turn a blind eye to terrorism,” he said.

Speaking in London on Sept. 18, Trump also stressed the need to focus on the Israeli hostages.

“We have to remember October 7, one of the worst, most violent days in the history of the world,” he said. “We have to have the hostages back immediately.”

Israel says its actions in Gaza, including the ongoing military offensive in the enclave, aim to disarm Hamas, achieve the release of all Israeli hostages, and create a civilian administration unaffiliated with either Hamas or the Palestinian Authority.

Israel has rejected the findings of a Sept. 16 U.N. report stating that Israel is committing genocide in the Gaza Strip.

Security Council Frustration

The draft resolution on Thursday failed with 14 votes in favor and one against. Under council rules, a single negative vote by a permanent member prevents adoption. The U.S. veto drew criticism from council members and regional representatives.

France called on Hamas to be disarmed and excluded from governance, but also pressed Israel to allow unhindered humanitarian aid.

Algeria’s ambassador, Amar Bendjama, apologized to Palestinians for not doing enough to save civilians’ lives.

Somalia’s envoy, Abukar Dahir Osman, said not passing the resolution was “a profound moral failure” that reflects a dangerous logic that “the suffering of some is more tolerable than the suffering of others, and that the lives of certain people matter less.”

“The moment we measure the worth of human life by nationality, ethnicity or circumstances, we lose the very foundation upon which this institution was built,” he added.

Pakistan described the veto as a “dark moment,” while the Russian delegate warned “there will be no breakthrough” so long as the United States “does not change the lens through which it regards the crisis in Gaza.”

Other members, including Greece, Slovenia, Panama, and South Korea, echoed concerns about famine and called for renewed efforts to secure both a cease-fire and the release of hostages.

Palestinian observer Riyad Mansour said failure to pass the resolution came at “a great cost” for the council’s “credibility and authority,” adding that the use of the veto in such situations “should simply not be allowed.”

US Allies Expected to Back Palestinian Statehood

Key Western allies, including France, the UK, Canada, and Australia, are expected to recognize Palestinian statehood at the U.N. summit in New York City on Sept. 22.

Israel and the United States oppose the push for recognition, saying it rewards Hamas for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, in which Hamas killed about 1,200 people and took 251 hostages.

Washington has said recognition can only come as part of a negotiated agreement with Israel.

According to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry, 65,000 Palestinians have been killed since the onset of the conflict in Gaza. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in the count. The Epoch Times cannot verify the accuracy of the figure.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 13:45

Goldman Raises Tesla Delivery Estimates, Notes Improving Brand Sentiment

Wall Street analysts are chasing Tesla stock as it trades above $400 a share, following news that Elon Musk purchased $1 billion worth of shares to start the week.

Looking ahead, Tesla's third-quarter delivery report is expected in less than two weeks, and Goldman analysts have raised both their delivery estimates and price targets. Goldman's data also shows sentiment around Tesla has improved after plunging earlier this year, when the Democratic Party's dark-money-funded NGO machine waged war on Musk over his DOGE efforts.

Members of the Socialist Rifle Association have been charged in the attack on the ICE facility in Alvaredo, TX in which a police officer was shot in the neck, and in two firebombings of Tesla dealerships (political attacks against @elonmusk). Another joined a foreign terror org. pic.twitter.com/StMPgjQtRS

— Luke Rosiak (@lukerosiak) September 18, 2025

A team of analysts led by Mark Delaney upgraded their third- and fourth-quarter delivery estimates for Tesla vehicles:

• 3Q25: 455K (prev. 430K; consensus 439K)

• 4Q25: 450K (prev. 443K; consensus 441K)

• 2026: Unchanged at 1.865M, in line with consensus

"We attribute the better 2H volumes in part to the recent Model Y L launch, in part based on somewhat better consumer survey data, and in part with IRA EV purchase credits set to expire on 9/30/25," Delaney wrote in a note to clients. 

Even with the upgraded quarterly delivery estimates, Delaney's team maintains a "Neutral" rating on the stock. However, they raised their 12-month price target to $395 from $300. Here's the explanation:

We remain Neutral rated on the stock. Longer term, we expect Tesla to grow its EPS driven in part by larger contributions from autonomy and robotics, although our base case expectation for profits in these areas is more measured than the company is targeting. As we detail in this note, we estimate that its 2030 EPS could be ~$2-3 to ~$20 (although we acknowledge there are outcomes beyond these ranges), and what we consider to be a middle of the road type scenario implies ~$7-$9 of EPS in 2030 and an EPS CAGR of ~40-50%. Given the move higher in market multiples more generally, as well as the growth rate we believe the business can support over the longer term, plus the increases we make to our forward EPS estimates, we raise our 12-month price target to $395 from $300. If Tesla can have outsized share in areas such as humanoid robotics and autonomy, then there could be upside to our price target, although if competition limits profits (as is happening with the ADAS market in China) or Tesla does not execute well, then there could be downside. 

New consumer survey data from HundredX and Morning Consult, which tracks net purchase intent and net buzz around the vehicle brand, shows sentiment improving. Earlier this year, Democratic Party–aligned dark-money-funded NGOs waged an informational war against Tesla over Musk's involvement with DOGE, but with that propaganda campaign subsiding many months ago, consumers appear to be returning to the brand.

App downloads are also showing a promising inflection point for the brand.

For the full report and chart pack, ZeroHedge Pro Subs can find the note in the usual place.

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 13:25

CDC Advisers Recommend Against MMRV Combo Vaccine For Young Kids, Table Vote On Hep B Shot

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should stop recommending a specific combination measles shot to young children, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) said on Sept. 18.

The CDC should recommend only the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine, and not the measles, mumps, rubella, varicella (MMRV) vaccine—which also prevents chicken pox—for children ages younger than 4, ACIP said.

The vote was 8 to 3. Dr. Robert Malone recused himself because he was in the past a paid expert for plaintiffs suing Merck, which manufactures MMR and MMRV vaccines.

If Jim O'Neill, the deputy health secretary and acting CDC director, accepts the recommendation, the CDC would change its vaccine schedule.

The CDC currently recommends either the MMRV vaccine, or the MMR vaccine along with a separate varicella shot, for the first dose against measles. It says the MMR vaccine is the preferred option for children ages 12 to 47 months, because the MMRV vaccine “is associated with a higher risk for fever and febrile seizures.”

About 85 percent of children receive the MMR and varicella vaccines, compared with 15 percent who receive an MMRV vaccine, for the first dose.

After MMR vaccination, there is about one additional febrile seizure per 3,000 to 4,000 of those vaccinated, compared with unvaccinated children. MMRV vaccination increases that risk twofold among young children, Dr. John Su, a CDC immunization official, said in a presentation. There’s no evidence of an increased risk following dose two of the MMRV vaccine among children ages 4 to 6, he said.

The second dose of a measles vaccine is recommended on the CDC schedule for children ages 4 to 6.

GlaxoSmithKline and Merck produce MMR vaccines cleared in the United States, but Merck also makes the only available MMRV vaccine. The companies did not respond to requests for comment by publication time.

“Any policy decision that compromises the clarity or consistency of vaccination guidance for MMRV has the potential to further diminish public confidence,” a Merck official told the panel before the vote, after referencing falling vaccination rates among kindergartners.

Retsef Levi, one of the ACIP members who voted for the change, said that he thinks that it will lead to an increase in vaccination because there will be fewer adverse events. Dr. Cody Meissner, who voted against the change, said he wanted to let parents choose between MMR and MMRV because some will want one less injection for their children.

The panel had been scheduled to vote on changing hepatitis B vaccine recommendations, but pushed the vote back to Sept. 19, when advisers are set to also vote on updated COVID-19 vaccine recommendations.

Additionally, the advisors voted to postpone a vote on delaying the first dose of a hepatitis B vaccine, which is currently recommended for newborns within hours of birth.

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) members in an 11–1 vote tabled a motion that would have advised the CDC to recommend pushing the first dose back to a minimum of 1 month of age.

Some members said they favored tabling the motion because of concerns that the CDC misrepresented the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine.

In a presentation on Thursday, Adam Langer of the CDC said that the Institute of Medicine (IOM), now known as the National Academy of Medicine, found the hepatitis B vaccine was “safe and effective,” citing a 2002 report from the institute.

Vicky Pebsworth, an ACIP member, pushed back against the CDC’s characterization, pointing out on Thursday that in its most recent report, in 2012, the institute said a review of available evidence resulted in being unable to reject—or accept—that the vaccine causes a variety of conditions, including encephalitis, or brain inflammation.

“IOM did not conclude that hepatitis B was safe, as has been said here,” she said.

Dr. Robert Malone, another member, who put forth the tabling motion, said Friday he had reviewed the assertions overnight and sided with Pebsworth.

“To interpret that the absence of data implies safety is, I think, a perversion,” he stated.

Other members indicated they voted to postpone the vote because they felt there was a lack of data supporting moving the birth dose back.

“No vaccine is 100 percent safe and no vaccine is 100 percent effective,” Dr. Cody Meissner, another ACIP member, stated. “What’s important for the provider before administering the vaccine is to think about that particular patient, and does the benefit exceed any possible side effect from the vaccine. And when you apply that to a newborn hepatitis B vaccine, I don’t think there’s any question whatsoever that the benefit far outweighs any adverse side effect.”

The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Most European countries do not recommend hepatitis B vaccination at birth unless the mother has hepatitis B. Some don’t recommend it at all for children.

“So far, the hepatitis B vaccine has been too costly to justify its inclusion in the program due to very low number of cases,” a spokesperson for the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, which does not recommend hepatitis B vaccination for most children, told The Epoch Times in an email.

Health Secretary Robert Kennedy, who oversees the CDC, had supported moving the birth dose, Dr. Debra Houry, a former top CDC official, testified earlier in the week. Stuart Burns, a Kennedy adviser, “told me that the secretary had suggested age 4,” she said, adding that a different health official told her that the secretary wanted the birth dose moved.

Hillary Blackburn, another ACIP member, was among those who had questioned how a minimum of 1 month of age had been decided, versus 2 months of age, which is when the first dose is recommended in certain other countries.

Martin Kulldorff, chair of ACIP, said he was involved in discussions with CDC officials on the matter.

“I think it has to do with that the second dose is recommended in the U.S. between one and two months,” Kulldorff said.

Several companies make hepatitis B vaccines available in the United States, including Merck and Sanofi.

“The reconsideration of the newborn hepatitis B vaccination on the established schedule poses a grave risk to health of children and to the public, which could lead to a resurgence of preventable infectious diseases,” a Merck official said during the hearing.

A Sanofi official said that “the hepatitis B birth dose and vaccination early in life remain the most effective option for prevention of hepatitis infections in infants and children.”

Tyler Durden Fri, 09/19/2025 - 13:05