Feed aggregator

April Employment Preview

Calculated Risk -

On Friday at 8:30 AM ET, the BLS will release the employment report for April. The consensus is for 210,000 jobs added, and for the unemployment rate to be unchanged at 3.8%.

There were 303,000 jobs added in March, and the unemployment rate was at 3.8%.
From Goldman Sachs economist Spencer Hill
We estimate nonfarm payrolls rose by 275k in April ... Our forecast reflects a favorable evolution in the April seasonal factors and a continued boost from above-normal immigration. ... We estimate that the unemployment rate edged down but was unchanged on a rounded basis at 3.8%
emphasis added
From BofA:
We look for another month of solid job gains in the April employment report this week. We expect nonfarm payrolls to rise by 250k on the month, with private sector job gains totaling 200k. Elsewhere, we expect the unemployment rate, weekly hours, and the participation rate to hold steady at 3.8%, 34.4, and 62.7%, respectively.
ADP Report: The ADP employment report showed 192,000 private sector jobs were added in April.  This was above consensus forecasts and suggests job gains slightly above consensus expectations, however, in general, ADP hasn't been very useful in forecasting the BLS report.

ISM Surveys: Note that the ISM indexes are diffusion indexes based on the number of firms hiring (not the number of hires).  The ISM® manufacturing employment index increased to 48.6%, up from 47.4% the previous month.   This would suggest about 20,000 jobs lost in manufacturing. The ADP report indicated 9,000 manufacturing jobs added in April.

The ISM® services employment index will be released tomorrow.

Unemployment Claims: The weekly claims report showed the same number of initial unemployment claims during the reference week from 212,000 in March to 212,000 in April.  This suggests a similar number of layoffs in April compared to March.

•  COVID: As far as the pandemic, the number of patients hospitalized during the reference week in April was around 6,000, down from 10,000 in March.  
Conclusion: My guess is employment gains will be above consensus expectations.

Realtor.com Reports Active Inventory Up 33.3% YoY; New Listings Up 10.4% YoY

Calculated Risk -

What this means: On a weekly basis, Realtor.com reports the year-over-year change in active inventory and new listings. On a monthly basis, they report total inventory. For April, Realtor.com reported inventory was up 30.4% YoY, but still down almost 36% compared to April 2017 to 2019 levels. 
 Now - on a weekly basis - inventory is up 33.3% YoY.

Realtor.com has monthly and weekly data on the existing home market. Here is their weekly report: Weekly Housing Trends View—Data Week Ending April 27, 2024
Active inventory increased, with for-sale homes 33.3% above year-ago levels.

For the 25th straight week, there were more homes listed for sale versus the prior year, giving homebuyers more options. As mortgage rates have climbed to new 2024 highs, we could see sellers adjust their plans, since nearly three-quarters of potential sellers also plan to buy a home.

New listings–a measure of sellers putting homes up for sale–were up this week, by 10.4% from one year ago.

Since February, the number of homes newly listed for sale has surpassed year ago pace by double-digit with the exception of a few weeks around this year’s spring holidays. As reported in the Realtor.com April housing report, newly listed homes trailed behind every prior year except for the pandemic-induced starting point of 2020 and the record low of 2023.
Realtor YoY Active ListingsHere is a graph of the year-over-year change in inventory according to realtor.com

Inventory was up year-over-year for the 25th consecutive week.  
However, inventory is still historically very low.
New listings remain below typical pre-pandemic levels although increasing. 

The snooze-a-than in jobless claims continues; what I am looking for in tomorrow’s jobs report

Angry Bear -

 – by New Deal democrat  The snooze-a-thon in jobless claims continues, as both initial and continuing claims are well-behaved within the narrow range where they have been generally for the past six months. Initial claims were unchanged least week at 208,000, while the four week moving average declilned -3,500 to 210,00. With the usual one […]

The post The snooze-a-than in jobless claims continues; what I am looking for in tomorrow’s jobs report appeared first on Angry Bear.

Monthly payments could get thousands of homeless people off the streets

Angry Bear -

Doug Smith Los Angeles Times Monthly payments for housing could get thousands of homeless people off the streets. It sounds like a voucher idea where the funds could only be used only for housing, apartments and heat and electricity. Or paid directly. A stipulated basic income to house thousands of homeless people in various situations […]

The post Monthly payments could get thousands of homeless people off the streets appeared first on Angry Bear.

US Factory Orders Rise In March... But February Saw Yet Another Downward Revision

Zero Hedge -

US Factory Orders Rise In March... But February Saw Yet Another Downward Revision

The roller-coaster ride of US durable goods and factory orders continued in March (final data just released) as the flip-flopping data series

Having plunged by the most since COVID lockdowns in January, US factory orders continued to accelerate in March, +1.6% MoM (as expected) - but February was revised lower... again. This pushed the YoY factory orders up 1.7% (nominal)...

Source: Bloomberg

This is the 17th monthly downward revision in the last 22 months... come on!!!

Source: Bloomberg

Core Factory Orders also rose MoM (+0.5% vs +0.2% exp)...

Source: Bloomberg

The final durable goods orders data prints for March were in line with the preliminary data but more problematically - Capital Goods Shipments Non-Defense Ex-Air was flat MoM, downwardly revised from the initial print...

Source: Bloomberg

...strongly suggesting the capex cycle is stalling.

Tyler Durden Thu, 05/02/2024 - 10:11

Wall Street’s Megabanks Have Trillions of Dollars Off-Balance Sheet, in a Replay of Accounting Hubris that Led to the 2008 Wall Street Collapse

Wall Street On Parade -

Wall Street’s Megabanks Have Trillions of Dollars Off-Balance Sheet, in a Replay of Accounting Hubris that Led to the 2008 Wall Street Collapse

By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: May 2, 2024 ~ When the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission released their final forensic report on the causes of the 2008 financial collapse on Wall Street – the worst collapse since the 1929-1932 collapse – it pointed to hidden leverage in off-balance sheet entities at the megabanks on Wall Street as a key driver of the crisis. It wrote: “From 2000 to 2007, large banks and thrifts generally had $16 to $22 in assets for each dollar of capital, for leverage ratios between 16:1 and 22:1. For some banks, leverage remained roughly constant. JP Morgan’s reported leverage was between 20:1 and 22:1. Wells Fargo’s generally ranged between 16:1 and 17:1. Other banks upped their leverage. Bank of America’s rose from 18:1 in 2000 to 27:1 in 2007. Citigroup’s increased from 18:1 to 22:1, then shot up to 32:1 by the end of 2007, when Citi … Continue reading →

-

Why the FED Should Be Already Cutting

The Big Picture -

 

 

The Fed held its benchmark Federal-Funds rate steady yesterday at 5.25% – 5.5%, leaving the possibility of cuts in the future. Jerome Powell repeated his “Data Dependent” mantra. “Persuasive evidence” that higher interest rates were no longer necessary to bring down inflation is what the FOMC wants, and today I want to share a few pieces of that evidence.

Our starting point is the shelter component of the Consumer Price Index. At about 40%, Shelter is the largest portion of the CPI. As the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) explains:

“The data used as inputs in the construction of the index for shelter, as well as the indexes for rent and OER, are collected in two surveys. The Consumer Expenditure (CE) Survey asks households the share of their budget which goes towards different categories of goods and services, and is subsequently used by the CPI program to create weights for index estimation. The Housing Survey collects price observations of rental housing units across the United States.”

Here is the BLS table showing the weighting:

Let’s hold the problems with survey data for another post, and instead zoom in on actual measures of rents.

As our chart (top) shows, the CPI model that measures rent year over year appears to lag other real-time measures by 18 months. The Apartment Rent Index peaked in November 2021 at ~17% year over year; as of April 2024 its down -0.8% year over year. The Zillow Observed Rent Index, with a different mix of rental apartments and houses, peaked around March 2022 at about 15%; it is now at about +3.8% year over year.

BLS measures of Shelter peaked much later, around May 2023 — a lag of 14-18 months. There are several technical reasons why OER lags so much in the BLS measure of shelter inflation — some of the lag is in how the BLS data is collected and assembled, but hold that aside for a moment. I want to focus on a very important aspect that makes the BLS measure of shelter inflation data so different from the observed rents like the Apartment Index and Zillow.

In a word, Renewals.

Almost two-thirds of all existing leases for apartments or house rentals get renewed. Nearly all of these renewals were signed one or two years ago. Leases are contracts, and they lay out the specific terms for renewals within the document.

What rates do you think landlords built into their lease renewals 12-24 months ago when they were drafting and negotiating those 2022 and ’23 leases? They obviously reflected the inflation rates then — which were peaking.

What do contracts negotiated and executed two years ago have to do with the rate of inflation today? You might assume “nothing,” but as we see in the BLS data, it has an outsized impact. It is very visible in BLS’ New Tenant Rent Index — that data, unlike OER, does not include renewals.

No surprise, it too peaked in 2022, and is now at +0.42% year over year:

 

Back out shelter, which is overweighted by renewals, and the CPI is at 2.3%:

 

Where the rubber meets the road is in mortgage rates: 61% of all homeowners have a mortgage; of those homeowners with mortgages, 78.7% have rates at or below 5%. Consider also 59.4% are at or below 4% mortgage rate. It should be well understood by now that these rates have become golden handcuffs, locking people who might want to move (trade up, new location, etc.) in place.

Going from a 3.75% mortgage rate to current rates of 7.5% will increase your monthly payments by about 50% — for the same-priced house! Imagine moving up to a more expensive house — one that might be larger or in a nicer neighborhood; it would double or event triple your mortgage expenses even for a modest increase in price.

This is why single-family house inventory is down 75% from its peak of 4 million annually to about 1 million today. That lack of supply has kept prices elevated. Higher rates not only are affecting existing home supplies, it is limiting new home construction, and making that more expensive as well.

I said this a few years ago, but it bears repeating here: If the Fed wants lower inflation, they should be lowering rates now.

 

 

 

 

Previously:
How the Fed Causes (Model) Inflation (October 25, 2022)

For Lower Inflation, Stop Raising Rates (January 18, 2023)

CPI Increase is Based on Bad Shelter Data (January 11, 2024)

How Everybody Miscalculated Housing Demand (July 29, 2021)

 

 

Sources:
Fed Says Inflation Progress Has Stalled and Extends Wait-and-See Rate Stance.

 

The post Why the FED Should Be <i>Already</i> Cutting appeared first on The Big Picture.

'Unity': Pro-Israel And Pro-Palestine Supporters Chant "F**k Joe Biden" In Solidarity As Democrats In 'Panic Mode' 

Zero Hedge -

'Unity': Pro-Israel And Pro-Palestine Supporters Chant "F**k Joe Biden" In Solidarity As Democrats In 'Panic Mode' 

How it started:

How it's going: 

In early March, President Biden and the Democrats called for the "Unity of all Americans." 

Fast forward to the Marxist revolution spreading like stage four cancer at the nation's colleges and universities, anti-Israel and counter-protesters found common ground, or perhaps a glimpse of solidarity, when both sides were heard chanting "F**K Joe Biden" this week at the University of Alabama. 

"It finally happened. Joe managed to get both sides of the protest to hate him for different reasons," X user Alex The Ghost wrote. 

Others on X agreed... 

The president and the radical left are walking a very fine line between supporting the Marxist kids at schools and their right to protest while simultaneously denouncing antisemitism. The surge in criticism from both the left and the right of the elderly president's Israel policy risks the unity of both sides in their hatred of the president. 

Meanwhile, Axios reports Democrats are in full-blown' panic mode' behind the scenes as campus takeovers by extremists of their own party produce terrible optics ahead of the presidential election in November. 

"The longer they continue, and the worse that they get, the worse it's going to be for the election overall," one House Democrat said.

The House Democrat warned that school chaos will only "bring out [the public's] most conservative side." 

What's clear is that campus protesters are becoming a political liability for Biden and Democrats. 

Republicans are now seizing on the opportunity from New York to California to inform voters that under this administration, the destruction and chaos of America continues. Add this chaos to the long list of failures by the Biden administration, including the migrant invasion, worsening drug overdose crisis, violent crime proliferating across metro areas, disastrous foreign policy moves in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, risking World War III, and, of course, the failure of Bidenomics that has ignited stagflation, crushing America's middle class. 

"[Democrats] were trying to make a big deal out of these Trump trials, but they've taken a back seat" to the protests, John Feehery, a Republican strategist and former congressional aide, told Financial Times

This week, the White House has been awfully silent on the campus takeover crisis. 

"When will the president himself, not his mouthpieces, condemn these hate-filled little Gazas?" Tom Cotton, the Republican senator from Arkansas, told reporters on Wednesday.

"President Biden needs to denounce Hamas' campus sympathizers without equivocating about Israelis fighting a righteous war of survival," Cotton added.

A recent poll showed that 81 percent of voters aged 18 to 35 disapprove of Biden’s handling of the conflict in the Middle East.

Michael Moore, who correctly predicted Trump’s victory in 2016, even issued a plea to Biden urging him to accomplish a ceasefire or face defeat.

We’re going to lose the election. We’re going to lose Michigan if we don’t turn this around. If President Biden doesn’t turn this around, that is going to do more to put Trump back in the White House. And I refuse to have Donald Trump back in the White House,” said Moore.

To sum up, the Democrats are in serious trouble if anti-Israel protesters and counter-protesters begin to march in solidarity around their hatred of Biden.

Tyler Durden Thu, 05/02/2024 - 09:35

Military Justice: Actions Needed to Help Ensure Success of Judge Advocate Career Reforms

GAO -

What GAO Found In 2021, the Department of Defense (DOD) required the military services to establish career paths in military justice that would allow military attorneys, known as judge advocates, to specialize as litigators (e.g., trial counsel, defense counsel, and military judges). The Navy has had such a program in place since 2007, and by 2022 the Army, the Marine Corps, and the Air Force had submitted plans for their own career paths. However, GAO identified issues that may hinder the success of these judge advocate career reforms. Specifically, the services: Do not have a communication strategy. The Army, Marine Corps, and Air Force have begun to promote their newly established career paths. However, judge advocates interviewed during this review told GAO that, in general, litigators at these three services do not trust that it will result in department-wide cultural change. Developing and implementing a strategy to communicate the establishment of and leadership support for the career paths may help attract judge advocates and increase litigator experience levels. Have not assessed the need for tailored experience standards for supervisory litigators and defense counsel. All four services have developed general professional experience requirements—called experience standards—judge advocates must obtain to serve as litigators. The services have also developed specific experience standards for a limited number of positions, such as military judges and victims' counsel. However, they have not assessed the need for tailored experience standards for other key positions, including supervisory litigators and defense counsel. Without assessing the need for tailored experience standards for other litigation positions, and implementing any recommendations from the assessment, the services lack reasonable assurance that they are placing the right judge advocates into potentially critical positions. Lack an approach for evaluating career path effectiveness. Multiple issues will limit the military services' ability to determine the effectiveness of these paths once fully implemented. First, the services do not collect key data to assess the effectiveness of the career paths, including litigator retention rates, reasons litigators separate from military service, and the number of litigator positions the services have filled. Second, DOD lacks a framework for assessing the effectiveness of the career path that includes performance measures and an evaluation plan. Collecting quality data on the military justice career path, developing a standardized suite of performance measures, and an evaluation plan would help the services measure progress towards achieving their goals and objectives as well as identify and address any challenges. Without addressing these issues, DOD risks falling short of achieving the objective of its judge advocate career reforms—increasing the experience and competence of military justice litigators. Why GAO Did This Study The military justice system depends on skilled and experienced litigators to try cases involving military personnel. However, DOD and a congressional committee have recently raised concerns about litigators' skills, qualifications, and career management, and whether they are sufficient to handle highly complex cases, such as sexual assault cases. House Report 117-397 includes a provision for GAO to review the military services' military justice communities, including their structure, experience requirements, and the use of military justice career paths. This report examines the extent to which the services have (1) implemented military justice career paths, (2) established experience standards for litigation positions, and (3) established mechanisms to determine the effectiveness of the career paths. GAO reviewed guidance, analyzed program documentation, and interviewed service officials as well as litigators at a nongeneralizable sample of four military installations.

Categories -

US Traders Took Powell's Pivot More Seriously Than Foreigners

Zero Hedge -

US Traders Took Powell's Pivot More Seriously Than Foreigners

Authored by Simon White, Bloomberg macro strategist,

Most of the hawkish tilt in yields and rise in Federal Reserve interest rate expectations this year has come in non-US trading hours. A dovish repricing would therefore require (other things equal) a change of trading direction only in overnight hours when volumes are typically lighter.

US yields have risen steadily since their end-of-December lows. Expectations the Fed was going to make over six rate cuts has dwindled down to barely one. The risk-reward now favors a dovish repricing as liquidity conditions are set to worsen as the year goes on. And that is more likely to come from domestic trading rather than from abroad, if recent history is anything to go by.

We can get hourly data going back to October for US Treasuries and fed funds futures, and separate it out into a US day session and an overnight session (both contracts trade 22-23 hours a day). The chart below shows the cumulative sum of the daily change in the day session and the overnight session for the 10-year yield. This year, almost all of the rise in 10-year yields has taken place in non-US trading hours.

Making the assumption that it’s predominately US-based volumes driving trading in US hours, US-based traders pushed yields lower from their October peak. But there has been little further movement all of this year. In contrast, predominately overseas trading (and no doubt some US-based algos and insomniac traders) has pushed the 10-year yield higher all this year – driving the 80 bps rise in the 10y in 2024.

The delineation between US and non-US trading is even more pronounced when looking at Fed rate expectations. The chart below is the same as the one above, but with the twelfth generic fed funds future, which gives an approximation for what’s priced for the Fed in ~12 months’ time.

Here we can see US-based trading drove the proliferation of rate cuts expected at the end of 2023. Since then, US-based traders have not changed their dovish view.

Almost all of the hawkish tilt this year - eradicating most of the cuts expected - came in trading during non-US hours.

It looks like mainly US-based traders took Powell’s pivot in December more seriously than those predominately based abroad. Either way, risk-reward now favors siding with the domestic team for a more dovish rate outcome than is currently priced.

 

Tyler Durden Thu, 05/02/2024 - 09:15

Unit Labor Costs Soar In Q1 As 'AI Productivity Boom' Fails To Show Up

Zero Hedge -

Unit Labor Costs Soar In Q1 As 'AI Productivity Boom' Fails To Show Up

Remember how AI was going to save the world, give us all more leisure time because of its massive boost to productivity?

Well, in Q1 in the US... it failed to show up as non-farm productivity - or nonfarm employee output per hour - rose at a measly 0.3% annualized rate after an upwardly revised 3.5% gain in the prior period (well below expectations)...

Source: Bloomberg

On the flip-side of that - and echoing the market-worrying ECI data earlier this week - Unit Labor Costs soared 4.7% in Q1 (well above the 4.0% expected and the 0.4% rise in Q4)...

Source: Bloomberg

So wage inflation is confirmed - rising at the fastest pace in a year - as all the gains we have been told to expect from AI just aren't there in the data.

While quarterly productivity figures are quite volatile, a sustained slowdown represents another hurdle for the Federal Reserve’s inflation fight. With interest rates expected to stay at a two-decade high for awhile longer, business investment in equipment will likely continue to be a weak factor in overall economic growth.

Today's data corroborates other data that showed gross domestic product cooled in the first quarter while employment costs rose by the most in a year. As a result, inflation is proving stubborn, supporting the Fed’s pivot to a more hawkish stance that will keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated.

Of course, Fed Chair Powell told us yesterday that he "doesn't see the stag or the flation" in US data...

Maybe he needs to subscribe to ZeroHedge to see the real picture.

Tyler Durden Thu, 05/02/2024 - 09:05

Lawler: Update on Mortgage Rates and Spreads and also New / Renewal Rents

Calculated Risk -

Today, in the Calculated Risk Real Estate Newsletter: Lawler: Update on Mortgage Rates and Spreads and also New / Renewal Rents

A brief excerpt:
As I’ve written about before, that “new” vs. “renewal” rent growth gap has been observed by publicly-traded companies that are in the residential rental business.

Freddie HPI CBSAOn that score, here are some data from Invitation Homes quarterly earnings supplement on rent growth trends.

Note that while rent increases on new leases were extremely low over the last two quarter, rents on renewals, while down from 2022, were still rising at a relatively rapid pace.
There is much more in the article.

Trade Deficit at $69.4 Billion in March

Calculated Risk -

The Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported:
The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis announced today that the goods and services deficit was $69.4 billion in March, down $0.1 billion from $69.5 billion in February, revised.

March exports were $257.6 billion, $5.3 billion less than February exports. March imports were $327.0 billion, $5.4 billion less than February imports.
emphasis added
U.S. Trade Exports Imports Click on graph for larger image.

Both exports imports decreased in March.

Exports are unchanged year-over-year; imports are up 3.1% year-over-year.
Both imports and exports decreased sharply due to COVID-19 and then bounced back - imports and exports have generally increased recently.

The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum.

U.S. Trade Deficit The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

Note that net, exports of petroleum products are positive and have been increasing.

The trade deficit with China increased to $17.2 billion from $16.6 billion a year ago.

Joe Biden Says There Are Very Fine People On Both Sides Of The Oct. 7 Debate

Zero Hedge -

Joe Biden Says There Are Very Fine People On Both Sides Of The Oct. 7 Debate

Authored by David Harsanyi via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

I condemn the anti-Semitic protests ...” President Joe Biden told reporters after days of anti-Jewish demonstrations at Columbia University and other Ivy League schools. “I also condemn those who don’t understand what’s going on with the Palestinians ...

President Joe Biden speaks during the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) dinner at the Washington Hilton, in Washington on April 27, 2024. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

Any morally clearheaded American already has a very good idea of what’s going on. Biden is bothsidesing the actions of keffiyeh-wearing terror cheerleaders on Columbia’s Gaza Quad—who target American Jews who have absolutely no bearing on Israel’s actions—with those who refuse to accept the blood libel of “genocide” in Gaza. It is the kind of odious moral relativism one expects to hear from a “Squad” member or clout-chasing far-right “influencer,” not the president.

Hamas, the governing authority in an autonomous Gaza—still supported widely by the Palestinian people—flooded over the border on Oct. 7, 2023, raping, murdering, and kidnapping more than a thousand men, women, and children in Israel, including American citizens. Afterward, Hamas retreated and hid among civilians to generate as many Palestinian martyrs as possible. The Israelis retaliated against this nihilistic death cult, keeping the civilian-to-combatant casualty ratio lower than perhaps any other instance of modern urban warfare.

That’s what’s going on. But because a not-insignificant contingent on the contemporary left is now both anti-Semitic and anti-“colonialist,” the president demanded Israel stop before the job was done. And he is willing to sell out a longtime ally and forsake the lives of American hostages to try to entice the votes in Jew-hating enclaves like Dearborn, Michigan, Yale University, and The Washington Post newsroom.

A number of people have pointed out the similarities between Biden’s condemnations and former President Donald Trump’s post-Charlottesville, Virginia, march “very fine people” comment. It’s a good gotcha. After all, Biden has risibly claimed that Trump’s comments impelled him to run for president (for the third time).

There is, however, a key difference. Trump’s garbled line was almost surely not aimed at tiki-torch neo-Nazis. Believe what you like about Trump’s motivations, but he also later unequivocally condemned the white supremacists on more than one occasion. Biden, on the other hand, can’t even get himself to call out brownshirts without throwing them a bone.

Also, incidentally, unlike the nuts in Virginia, these people will be working at our top law firms, in media organizations and in the State Department. Oh, the president also wants you to pay their loans.

Earlier, The Washington Post, like most outlets, claimed that “Biden denounces antisemitism on college campuses amid Yale, Columbia protests.” While technically true, the framing ignores the president’s equivocation. The denouncement was a pro forma White House Passover press release that spent as much space prattling on about a two-state solution as it did the “protests.” For comparison, Biden’s Ramadan press release noted the “terrible suffering on the Palestinian people,” repeated fake Hamas causality numbers and condemned “Islamophobia,” but said nothing about the widespread outbreak of anti-Semitism.

Then again, Democrats are increasingly incapable of even talking about anti-Semitism without diluting any condemnation with mention of “Islamophobia.”

You might recall a few years back a certain Democratic congresswoman was going on about “Benjamin”-grubbing rootless cosmopolitans hypnotizing the world for their evil. After a handful of Jewish Democrats complained about her rhetoric, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi finally agreed to pass a resolution condemning Rep. Ilhan Omar. By the end of debate, of course, the resolution was teeming with platitudes and condemnations of a rainbow of thought crimes, with references to Alfred Dreyfus, Leo Frank, Henry Ford, and “anti-Muslim bigotry,” but not Omar.

We all have a responsibility to speak out against anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, racism, and all forms of hatred and bigotry, especially as we see a spike in hate crimes in America,” is how Sen. Kamala Harris whitewashed the rising anti-Jewish pronouncements of her party. Which is to say, for years now, Democrats have been downplaying anti-Semitism as it creeped into college campuses, Congress, the Women’s March, Black Lives Matter, and now the mainstream.

And now, here we are. We have a president who can’t make a moral distinction between bigots and their targets.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Thu, 05/02/2024 - 08:45

Thursday Humor: Jobless Claims

Zero Hedge -

Thursday Humor: Jobless Claims

With WARNs high, JOLTS data tumbling - led construction jobs collapsing, and Challenger-Grey layoffs remarkably elevated, why would anyone question the government's official data on jobless claims - that continues to languish (in a good way) near record lows.

Last week saw 208,000 Americans file for jobless benefits for the first time (the same as the prior week), basically flat for the last three years...

Source: Bloomberg

In the real world labor market, 2024 has been a shitshow of layoffs...

1. Everybuddy: 100% of workforce
2. Wisense: 100% of workforce
3. CodeSee: 100% of workforce
4. Twig: 100% of workforce
5. Twitch: 35% of workforce
6. Roomba: 31% of workforce
7. Bumble: 30% of workforce
8. Farfetch: 25% of workforce
9. Away: 25% of workforce
10. Hasbro: 20% of workforce
11. LA Times: 20% of workforce
12. Wint Wealth: 20% of workforce
13. Finder: 17% of workforce
14. Spotify: 17% of workforce
15. Buzzfeed: 16% of workforce
16. Levi's: 15% of workforce
17. Xerox: 15% of workforce
18. Qualtrics: 14% of workforce
19. Wayfair: 13% of workforce
20. Duolingo: 10% of workforce
21. Rivian: 10% of workforce
22. Washington Post: 10% of workforce
23. Snap: 10% of workforce
24. eBay: 9% of workforce
25. Sony Interactive: 8% of workforce
26. Expedia: 8% of workforce
27. Business Insider: 8% of workforce
28. Instacart: 7% of workforce
29. Paypal: 7% of workforce
30. Okta: 7% of workforce
31. Charles Schwab: 6% of workforce
32. Docusign: 6% of workforce
33. Riskified: 6% of workforce
34. EA: 5% of workforce
35. Motional: 5% of workforce
36. Mozilla: 5% of workforce
37. Vacasa: 5% of workforce
38. CISCO: 5% of workforce
39. UPS: 2% of workforce
40. Nike: 2% of workforce
41. Blackrock: 3% of workforce
42. Paramount: 3% of workforce
43. Citigroup: 20,000 employees
44. ThyssenKrupp: 5,000 employees
45. Best Buy: 3,500 employees
46. Barry Callebaut: 2,500 employees
47. Outback Steakhouse: 1,000
48. Northrop Grumman: 1,000 employees
49. Pixar: 1,300 employees
50. Perrigo: 500 employees
51. Tesla: 10% of workforce

Under the hood, California and Massachusetts were the big outliers to the downside (taking New Jersey's place in the hall of fame of made-up data)...

Continuing claims - according to the government - were also flat week on week at 1.774 million Americans, having gone practically nowhere for a year...

Spot the odd one out... (or spot the government-supplied data)...

Source: Bloomberg

Ah, Bidenomics!!

If Trump wins in November, will all this data suddenly be 'allowed' to reflect reality?

Tyler Durden Thu, 05/02/2024 - 08:36

U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, March 2024

BEA -

The U.S. goods and services trade deficit decreased in March 2024 according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis and the U.S. Census Bureau. The deficit decreased from $69.5 billion in February (revised) to $69.4 billion in March, as imports decreased more than exports. The goods deficit increased $0.8 billion in March to $92.5 billion. The services surplus increased $0.9 billion in March to $23.1 billion. Full Text

Categories -

Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims at 208,000

Calculated Risk -

The DOL reported:
In the week ending April 27, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 208,000, unchanged from the previous week's revised level. The previous week's level was revised up by 1,000 from 207,000 to 208,000. The 4-week moving average was 210,000, a decrease of 3,500 from the previous week's revised average. The previous week's average was revised up by 250 from 213,250 to 213,500.
emphasis added
The following graph shows the 4-week moving average of weekly claims since 1971.

Click on graph for larger image.

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims decreased to 210,000.

The previous week was revised up.

Weekly claims were lower than the consensus forecast.

Public Health Preparedness: HHS Should Address Strategic National Stockpile Coordination Challenges

GAO -

What GAO Found The Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) is a multibillion dollar inventory of drugs, vaccines, supplies, and other medical countermeasures that can be provided to jurisdictions—states, localities, territories—and Tribes during emergencies. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided four primary types of resources ahead of recent public health emergencies—COVID-19 and mpox—to help jurisdictions access and use SNS assets. This included guidance, recurring communication, trainings and exercises, and an inventory management system. The 62 jurisdictions we surveyed reported challenges during the COVID-19 and mpox responses related to understanding the SNS inventory and coordinating on requesting and receiving SNS assets. HHS has taken steps to address some of these challenges by creating a new office focused on external coordination and developing a new system to track SNS requests. Jurisdictions also reported challenges related to understanding federal agencies' roles and navigating outdated guidance. These challenges led to jurisdictional confusion during response efforts. While HHS has taken some actions, challenges still exist regarding the lack of (1) clearly defined roles for HHS agencies that work with SNS assets; and (2) procedures for updating SNS's main guidance document. For example, the main guidance document for SNS assets has not been updated since 2014 and does not reflect the agency currently responsible for the SNS. By defining and sharing SNS roles and developing procedures for updating guidance, HHS would help jurisdictions navigate SNS processes improving response efforts. GAO Survey Results About Strategic National Stockpile Written Guidance Jurisdiction and tribal officials identified other coordination issues that may affect future responses. This included jurisdiction officials not seeing, or being unaware of, HHS response plans including those specific to the SNS, and federal efforts needed to help jurisdictions manage stockpiles that expanded after the COVID-19 pandemic. HHS officials said they plan to coordinate with jurisdictions on these issues by creating and sharing information about response planning and stockpile management. Also, GAO found that Tribes experienced various concerns with requesting and receiving SNS assets. In response, an HHS working group is focused on clarifying the ways Tribes can request SNS assets. However, HHS has not assessed the unique challenges—such as geography and infrastructure—that could affect Tribes' ability to receive SNS assets. By engaging with Tribes to do such an assessment, HHS and Tribes would be better equipped to deliver and receive assets, respectively, collectively strengthening preparedness and response efforts to future incidents. Why GAO Did This Study Recent public health emergencies have highlighted the importance of coordination across all levels of government. One key component of the nation's medical response is the SNS. In January 2022, GAO placed HHS's leadership and coordination of public health emergencies on its High Risk List, in part due to coordination issues with the SNS. The CARES Act includes a provision for GAO to report on the federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This report examines (1) SNS resources provided to jurisdictions; (2) challenges jurisdictions faced in accessing SNS assets during two recent emergencies; and (3) jurisdictional and tribal SNS coordination issues that might affect future responses. For this work, GAO surveyed public health officials from all 62 jurisdictions nationwide and received a 100 percent response rate. GAO also interviewed officials in nine jurisdictions which were selected to obtain variation in governance structure and tribal presence, among other criteria. GAO also reviewed guidance, presentations, strategic plans, and other documentation; compared HHS actions to leading practices for collaboration and federal internal controls; and interviewed HHS and tribal officials.

Categories -

Pages