Zero Hedge

Jane Street Sued For Crypto Insider Trading That Accelerated Terraform Collapse

Jane Street Sued For Crypto Insider Trading That Accelerated Terraform Collapse

For years - literally - we have been pounding the table and pointing out market rigging and manipulation irregularities in the crypto markets which, for reasons of our own, we attributed to one of the world's foremost HFT shops and most profitable "market makers" in the world (if not India), Jane Street. Below is an example from 2023, and here are hundreds of others...

As it turns out someone noticed.

Jane Street was sued for alleged insider trading by the administrator winding up the affairs of Terraform Labs, the firm whose $40 billion collapse in 2022 roiled the crypto markets, contributed to the collapse of FTX and sparked a brutal crypto winter which culminated with the bankruptcy and prison sentence of Sam Bankman Fried.. who just happens to be a former Jane Street employee (along with his polycule partner Caroline Ellison) and the man many claim devised some of the most intricate crypto manipulation schemes operating to this day. 

Jane Street used "non-public information to front-run trading that hastened the collapse of Terraform," Todd Snyder, a bankruptcy court-appointed administrator and co-head of the Piper Sander Restructuring group, claimed in a redacted complaint filed Monday in Manhattan federal court. Illegally using this information allowed Jane Street “to unwind hundreds of millions of dollars in potential exposure at precisely the right time, mere hours before the Terraform ecosystem collapsed.”

For those lucky enough not to remember, Terraform imploded when its stablecoin TerraUSD lost its peg to the US dollar, leading to the collapse of its sister token, Luna. The failure set off a chain reaction across the crypto industry, ultimately sending bitcoin plunging below $20,000. Terraform co-founder, Do Kwon, who was recently sentenced to 15 years in prison, deceived investors about the stability of TerraUSD, which was said to be algorithmically “pegged” to the US dollar. Kwon pleaded guilty to fraud and was sentenced in December to 15 years in prison by a New York judge who called his crime “a fraud of epic generational scale.” 

Terraform filed for bankruptcy in January 2024 and a wind down trust was formally established later that year. 

Snyder was tapped to administer a trust to maximize the recovery for Terraform’s investors and creditors and to close out its operations. As part of his work, Snyder made a stark realization, one which we were aware of all along: "Jane Street abused market relationships to rig the market in its favor during one of the most consequential events in crypto history.”  

“On behalf of injured parties, we will pursue all avenues supported by the facts and the law against those who exploited their position and reaped substantial profits at the expense of Terraform Labs’ creditors,” Snyder said and is now seeking damages from Jane Street, its co-founder Robert Granieri, and employees Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang.

Here are some of the shocking details that the lawsuit revealed:

By late 2018, Jane Street had signed up to trade directly with Terraform but its trading in Terraform’s tokens didn’t take off until February 2022, when Jane Street sent Bryce Pratt, a former intern at Terraform, to establish lines of communication with his former Terraform colleagues. 

Among Pratt’s communications with Terraform was a group chat he set up with his former colleagues, including a software engineer and the head of business development at Terraform. The group named the chat “Bryce’s Secret” and used it as a way to channel Terraform-related information back to Jane Street.

After Pratt started an email chain to introduce Terraform’s head of business development and Jane Street’s “DeFi” leaders, the parties began regularly communicating and discussing a potential Jane Street investment in Terraform, the lawsuit said. But Jane Street turned those communications into a back-channel source for material nonpublic information about Terraform and later used the confidential information it learned to pursue trades to maximize profits for itself.

Specifically, on May 7, 2022, at 5:44 p.m. EST, Terraform withdrew 150 million TerraUSD from the Curve3pool, a liquidity pool where stablecoins could be exchanged one for the other. 

Less than 10 minutes after Terraform’s withdrawal, which hadn’t been publicly announced to the market, a crypto wallet that some analysts have linked to Jane Street withdrew 85 million of TerraUSD from the same liquidity pool, the complaint alleges.

The next day, Kwon said publicly that the 150 million withdrawal was meant to move TerraUSD to a new liquidity pool for stablecoins. However, the exact timing of activities associated with the new liquidity pool, including any withdrawals from the Curve3pool, wasn’t public knowledge.

The trades accelerated the collapse of Terraform by adding selling pressure at a critical moment, while allowing Jane Street to profit (or avoid massive losses).

It didn't end there, however, and after the May 7 trade, Jane Street continued to use confidential information, including what it learned from Jump Trading, to trade TerraUSD to reap more profits, the lawsuit said. 

On May 9, while TerraUSD was depegged but not fully collapsed, Pratt set up a group message with Kwon, Huang and others at Jane Street, expressing the firm’s interest in bidding on either bitcoin or the Luna token. Kwon responded that Bill DiSomma, co-founder of Jump, should have reached out to Jane Street to discuss a fundraise for Terraform.

Snyder's lawsuit against Jane Street is part of a broader effort by the Terraform wind-down administrator to pursue parties allegedly involved in or profiting from the collapse. In December 2025, Snyder filed a separate $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading  - another giant HFT "market maker" - accusing it of market manipulation, self-dealing, and helping accelerate the Terra crash through similar alleged misconduct.

A Jane Street spokesperson told Bloomberg the suit “desperate” and “a transparent attempt to extract money." We say that the revelation of market rigging and manipulation that will now emerge, will make everyone's head spin. 

The case is Snyder v. Jane Street Group LLC, 26-cv-1504, US District Court, Southern District of New York

Jane Street Lawsuit by Zerohedge

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 08:11

Moscow Police Targeted In Deadly Car Bombing On 4th Anniversary Of Russian Invasion

Moscow Police Targeted In Deadly Car Bombing On 4th Anniversary Of Russian Invasion

There's been another killing by explosive device in the heart of Moscow - this time coming on the fourth anniversary of the start of the Russia-Ukraine war.

The Russian Interior Ministry has confirmed that a culprit detonated powerful bomb beside a police patrol car in central Moscow early Tuesday, near a public transport hub, which killed one officer and wounded two more.

Anadolu/Getty Images

Based on the details, the attack was clearly targeting the police officers, as the attacker approached their car before quickly setting off the bomb.

The patrol car was badly damaged, with windows shattered, littering the scene with debris at Savyolovsky railway station square - which is one of the capital’s main railway hubs.

Subsequently, there was this bit of strange and contradictory reporting:

The ministry initially said the perpetrator had fled. Minutes later, it said the man was found dead at the site after inspecting the scene and reviewing surveillance footage.

Authorities gave no immediate details about the explosive or the attacker’s motive.

This particular incident comes after a string of assassinations of high profile generals and Russian figures, but also mimics similar prior seemingly 'random' attack on Moscow police.

For example in December 2025 two police officers were killed in an explosion in southern Moscow while attempting to detain a suspicious individual near their vehicle, which occurred just days after a Russian general was assassinated in the same area.

The blast underscored a troubling reality for the Kremlin - that the war's shadow has been creeping deeper into the capital through an apparently intelligence-orchestrated dirty war.

Some local reports are saying this fresh Tuesday attack was the result of a suicide bombing. Russian security services are investigating the scene:

Earlier this month, a senior Russian military intelligence officer was shot multiple times and seriously wounded in an attack authorities squarely blamed on Ukrainian intelligence.

The victim was a high level Russian intelligence official, Vladimir Alekseyev - the deputy head of Moscow's GRU military intelligence. He had long been sanctioned in the West for his alleged role in cyberattacks and allegations that he was behind the alleged 2018 Novichok nerve agent attack in Britain.

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 08:05

AMD Shares Soar After Meta Chip Deal Worth More Than $100 Billion

AMD Shares Soar After Meta Chip Deal Worth More Than $100 Billion

Shares of Advanced Micro Devices surged the most in five months in premarket trading, after Meta disclosed a multi-year deal to deploy up to 6 gigawatts of AMD Instinct GPUs to power its next-generation AI data centers.

Meta will begin deploying these AMD chips in the second half of 2026. The first phase will support the deployment of 1 gigawatt.

AMD stated:

This agreement expands on the companies' existing strategic partnership and aligns roadmaps across silicon, systems, and software to deliver AI platforms purpose-built for Meta's workloads. The first deployment will use a custom AMD Instinct GPU based on the MI450 architecture to deliver AI platforms that are optimized for Meta's workloads at gigawatt-scale. Shipments supporting the first gigawatt deployment are scheduled to begin in the second half of 2026.

Part of the deal includes Meta receiving a performance-based warrant for up to 160 million shares of AMD stock, structured to vest based on specific milestones tied to chip shipments. The first tranche vests with the initial 1-gigawatt of shipments, with additional tranches vesting as Meta's purchases scale to 6 gigawatts.

AMD shares in New York jumped as much as 15% in premarket trading. As of 7:30 a.m. ET, the stock was up about 12%. If those gains hold into the cash session, it would mark AMD's largest intraday increase since early October. Meta's stock was marginally higher in premarket, while Nvidia shares traded down nearly 1%.

"Our ambitions are pretty high," said Santosh Janardhan, Meta's head of global infrastructure, who oversees the company's data centers and their technical architecture, as quoted by Bloomberg.

AMD Chief Executive Officer Lisa Su said, "What we're looking to do is go big and accelerate," adding, "We were on a very good path with Meta, but this actually takes our relationship to the next level."

Meta is already AMD's second-largest customer, and these chip shipments will only set to increase. AMD reported $34.6 billion in sales last year and revenue this year could jump by at least 34% as the AI data center infrastructure cycle gains momentum.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the Meta-AMD deal to buy 6 gigawatts of AMD Instinct GPUs is worth more than $100 billion, potentially giving Meta ownership of up to 10% of AMD's stock.

In October, AMD signed a deal with OpenAI that had terms similar to those of the Meta deal. We view these deals as "circular financing," something we have previously highlighted.

To note, Meta said last week that it would purchase millions of Nvidia's GPUs as well.

"This is an important step for Meta as we diversify our compute," Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote in a statement, adding, "I expect AMD to be an important partner for many years to come."

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 07:45

Lamborghini EV Lanzador Bites The Dust As Electrified Supercar Demand Hits "Close To Zero"

Lamborghini EV Lanzador Bites The Dust As Electrified Supercar Demand Hits "Close To Zero"

Big legacy U.S. and European automakers are frantically dialing back their electric vehicle bets, scaling back once-hyped roadmaps to full electrification as demand for these vehicles implodes.

The latest automaker to reverse course is not a mass-market sedan or SUV maker, but a luxury supercar brand: Lamborghini.

CEO Stephan Winkelmann told the UK's The Sunday Times that he has ended plans to build EVs, saying customers are not seeking quiet supercars and that demand has collapsed.

Winkelmann said that EV development risked becoming "an expensive hobby" for the car company. He stated that the previously announced all-electric concept car, Lanzador, will no longer be part of its future lineup of supercars.

He noted that the "acceptance curve" for EVs in Lamborghini's target market was flattening and "close to zero."

Winkelmann said the Lanzador will be replaced by a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. He added that the Italian carmaker will produce internal combustion engines "for as long as possible."

"EVs, in their current form, struggle to deliver this specific emotional connection," Winkelmann explained, pointing out that customers who buy luxury cars seek the sound of a roaring engine.

The slower path toward full electrification, or in some cases partial electrification, is not just a Lamborghini story or limited to the luxury auto market. There has also been a sharp reversal by mass-market automakers over the last six months or so, as they dial back EV ambitions or entirely scrap their electrification plans:

The pivot by Western automakers comes as the West dials back on "climate crisis" policies, which have crushed manufacturing bases from Germany to the U.S. Midwest. Deindustrialization trends have proven to be nation-killing, and green spending has been nothing more than the most significant misallocation of human resources in history (read here).

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 06:55

Trump's Board Of Peace Mulling Stablecoin For Gaza Efforts: FT

Trump's Board Of Peace Mulling Stablecoin For Gaza Efforts: FT

Authored by Turner Wright via CoinTelegraph.com,

The Board of Peace established by US President Donald Trump, which requires a $1 billion contribution for membership, is reportedly exploring a stablecoin for use in rebuilding Gaza's economy following two years of war triggered by a Hamas terror attack in October 2023.

According to a Monday Financial Times report, the board is in the preliminary stages of discussing whether a stablecoin could be used to help rebuild Gaza’s economy. A person familiar with the project reportedly said the stablecoin would not be a meme coin or a replacement for fiat currency, but rather “a means to allow Gazans to transact digitally.”

Trump announced the formation of the board in January. Membership requires countries to contribute $1 billion for a permanent, renewable role, while the US, according to Trump’s social media announcement, pledged $10 billion. The majority of countries in western Europe declined invitations to join, while 26 countries including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Hungary, and El Salvador were founding members.

The FT report did not state which entity could be responsible for issuing a stablecoin should the board move forward. However, the Trump administration has supported policies allowing broader use of stablecoins in the US, including the president signing the GENIUS Act into law in July.

“The current proposal for the Gaza stablecoin is still very premature,” Snir Levi, CEO of blockchain intelligence platform Nominis, told Cointelegraph. “[O]ver the last two years, OTC desks in Gaza have moved over $100 million in stablecoins with almost no restrictions, without the proper framework, same thing will happen with the Gaza stablecoin.”

Trump also reportedly considering tokenized postwar Gaza plan

There has been a ceasefire agreement in place for Gaza officially since October 2025, though Israeli forces have reportedly repeatedly violated the deal. A significant portion of populated areas in the territory have been destroyed or heavily damaged since 2023.

As a result, members of the Trump administration, including the president and his son-in-law Jared Kushner have proposed plans for developing the area.

Trump reportedly mulled a plan to tokenize land and use digital tokens to relocate and rehouse residents during a US occupation of the territory. He said in February 2025 that the US should “take over” Gaza and make it the “Riviera of the Middle East” before a ceasefire was in place.

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 06:30

80% Of The World's Population Will Use Social Media By 2028

80% Of The World's Population Will Use Social Media By 2028

Launched in 2004 as an experiment at Harvard, Facebook is often regarded as the defining social media platform of its era, the one that brought such platforms into the mainstream.

Facebook reached one million users just ten months after its launch; it took Mark Zuckerberg's social network around eight years to reach one billion users.

That milestone was reached in October 2012; by that point, many other social media platforms had become household names, including Twitter (launched in 2006) and Instagram (launched in 2010).

Just over 20 years after Facebook first took the internet by storm, social media use is almost universal.

As Valentine Fourreau shows in the infographic below, based on Statista Market Insights data, over 5 billion people worldwide were estimated to use social media in the world in 2024, a global penetration rate of almost 71 percent. According to Statista estimates, the global penetration rate of social media should reach 82.6 percent by 2029.

80% of the World's Population Will Use Social Media by 2028 | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

In recent years, growing concerns about mental health, online safety and digital addiction have led governments worldwide to take action to limit children's access to social media.

In November 2024, Australia passed the Online Safety Amendment, banning social media for users under 16, and platforms face significant fines if they don't comply.

Several European countries are working on comparable bans, while similar legislation will take effect in Brazil in March 2026.

According to a recent WHO survey, one in ten adolescents worldwide is considered to be a problematic social media user.

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 05:45

'Out Of Africa': Beijing Slashes Investment Up To 85%

'Out Of Africa': Beijing Slashes Investment Up To 85%

Authored by James Gorrie via The Epoch Times,

For more than a decade, China’s footprint across Africa has expanded at a phenomenal pace.

Railways in Kenya, ports in Tanzania, energy projects across sub-Saharan Africa, and militarized infrastructure in various places have meant billions in state-backed loans. For decades, Beijing has positioned itself as Africa’s largest trading partner and its most aggressive infrastructure financier.

But something has changed.

In some sectors, such as energy lending by Chinese development finance institutions, investment levels have fallen by as much as 85 percent from their peak years. That’s not a rounding error, that’s a strategic retreat.

What’s really going on? Is China walking away from Africa? Or is Africa revealing something deeper about China’s own economic stress?

It’s all of the above and more.

The Pullback Is Real—and Sharp

According to research cited by the Clean Air Task Force, Chinese development finance for African energy projects has declined roughly 85 percent since 2015. That’s a dramatic contraction in capital deployment.

Separate reporting based on data from Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center shows that Chinese lending to Africa has fallen sharply in recent years. In some reports, China’s investment fell nearly 46 percent year over year in 2024.

This isn’t just a pause. It’s a reset.

For years, Beijing fueled infrastructure growth across the continent through state-backed loans tied to its Belt and Road Initiative expansion. Now, the tap isn’t fully off, but it’s not flowing as freely as it used to.

China Isn’t Leaving Africa, but It’s Changing How It Engages

Before jumping to the “China is out of Africa” conclusion, it’s important to note a few critical facts.

For one, China remains Africa’s largest trading partner. Trade volumes remain substantial and have even grown in recent years.

But lending and investment are different from trade.

Instead of large sovereign infrastructure loans, Beijing appears to be shifting toward more commercially viable projects and private sector–led foreign direct investment. Beijing is also favoring trade expansion over debt expansion.

That’s a broad policy shift. An analysis of broader outbound Chinese investment patterns in 2025 shows a more cautious and selective capital strategy globally—not just in Africa.

In other words, China isn’t abandoning Africa—Beijing is abandoning risk.

The Real Story May Be Domestic

But the context may be less about Africa and more about China. It’s no state secret that China’s economy is under real pressure, including a prolonged property sector downturn, persistent and high local government debt, slowing GDP growth, and weak domestic consumption.

Those challenges have led Beijing to ramp up capital controls and financial risk management, both of which are indicators of a markedly different economy than the one for which China became world-renowned.

In short, China’s days of double-digit expansion are long gone. A new malaise has set in that isn’t easily overcome. Chinese authorities are increasingly focused on stabilizing employment, preventing financial contagion, and managing demographic decline.

When capital gets tight at home, overseas mega-projects become harder to justify—especially in politically complex or financially risky environments. Thus, Africa isn’t being punished—it’s being reprioritized.

Even some critics of the “debt trap diplomacy” narrative note that China has become far more cautious as a creditor in recent years.

Strategic Reassessment, Not Strategic Retreat

China’s Africa policy framework still operates through the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation, which continues to promote trade, tariff elimination for least-developed African countries, and development cooperation.

Trade between China and Africa reached nearly $300 billion in recent reporting, underscoring that economic ties remain strong. But there’s a difference between facilitating trade and underwriting sovereign debt.

China’s earlier model, which provided large, state-backed loans for infrastructure, carried political and financial risks. Some projects underperformed, and other countries struggled with repayment, becoming vassals of Beijing amid intensifying global scrutiny.

Beijing appears to have decided to scale back exposure to such risks, tightening standards and investing where returns are clearer. That’s not ideological behavior but balance-sheet management.

What This Says About China’s Economy

An 85 percent reduction in certain categories of overseas investment doesn’t just reflect changing foreign policy. It signals that large-scale overseas lending no longer aligns with domestic priorities and that conserving capital is a necessity, as liquidity and risk appetite have tightened.

Beijing recognizes that as economic conditions decline, domestic stability declines as well. Therefore, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is prioritizing internal stability by managing debt, stabilizing property markets, and preserving employment. At this point, it’s clear that these rising domestic problems matter more to the CCP than expanding geopolitical infrastructure influence.

It’s not necessarily that the era of unlimited Belt and Road expansion is over, but China is entering a phase of selective, return-driven engagement over broad strategic underwriting.

This is what economic maturation—or economic strain—looks like.

Global Ambitions Meet Financial Reality

The CCP’s global ambitions are now bound by domestic economic reality. Overextension abroad while managing economic fragility at home is a dangerous combination.

Pulling back could signal discipline, economic stress, or both. Economic stress demands financial discipline, and when the world’s second-largest economy tightens its checkbook by 85 percent in key sectors, the story isn’t just about Africa’s financial future—it’s about China’s.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 05:00

Critical Part Of Hungary & Slovakia's Russian Oil Flows Has Just Been Blown Up

Critical Part Of Hungary & Slovakia's Russian Oil Flows Has Just Been Blown Up

Ukraine's long-range drone campaign has reportedly once again struck at the heart of Russia's energy artery, igniting a fire at a key Transneft oil pumping station in the republic of Tatarstan early Monday.

Regional officials confirmed the incident after local media and Telegram channels first reported explosions near the strategic facility, with authorities announcing: "as a result of falling drone debris, a local fire broke out in an industrial zone."

Source: Moscow Times/@exilenova_plus

No casualties resulted from the blasts which took place around 4am at the Kaleykino pumping station. A fire ensued after eyewitnesses reported hearing some seven explosions.

Ukrainian media has cited a source who described, "Tonight, long-range SBU drones caused a 'bavovna' (explosion) at the main oil pumping station 'Kaleykino' near Almetyevsk in Tatarstan. It receives oil from Western Siberia and the Volga region and mixes it before sending it for export. The station is a key hub for supplying raw materials to the 'Druzhba' oil pipeline."

The Moscow Times also notes: 

Kaleykino serves as a critical receiving and mixing terminal that aggregates crude oil flows from several Russian regions and facilitates the transport of nearly 30% of the country’s crude oil toward major export routes like the Druzhba pipeline.

Druzhba has been featured heavily in the news of late, given oil shipments to Hungary and Slovakia via Druzhba were halted after a Jan. 27 airstrike on equipment in western Ukraine.

Ukraine blamed the attack on Moscow, while Hungary is blaming Kiev for deliberately not repairing the pipeline because it doesn't want it to supply Budapest, or Slovakia, with Russian oil. A political firestorm has ensued ever since.

The controversy has led the Orban government to on Monday block the EU's proposed €90 billion loan package for Ukraine and also it vetoed the 20th round of anti-Moscow sanctions.

Interesting timing, to say the least...

The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) has been very open about its cross-border aims regarding attacks on Russian energy, with a Ukrainian SBU official boasting as follows: 

"The SBU is systematically working to cut down on the extraction and transportation of Russian oil. Our special operations are methodically reducing the filling of the Russian budget with petrodollars, which finance the war against Ukraine. This work will continue to exhaust and gradually bleed the Russian economy."

At the same time, Hungary and Slovakia's stances as disrupters of EU policy have been a big 'win' for Moscow.

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 04:15

These Are The World's 10 Deadliest Viruses

These Are The World's 10 Deadliest Viruses

Some viruses infect millions but kill relatively few. Others spread less widely yet prove far more lethal once contracted.

This graphic, via Visual Capitalist's Bruno Venditti, ranks 10 of the world’s deadliest viruses by case fatality rate: the percentage of infected people who die from the disease.

Rabies tops the list, with a fatality rate approaching 100% once symptoms appear.

The data for this visualization comes from various sources such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the BC Centre for Disease Control, the Australian Government, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Reuters, and the UK Government.

Rabies: Almost Universally Fatal

The virus kills an estimated 59,000 people per year, primarily in Africa and Southeast Asia. The virus spreads primarily through the saliva of infected animals, especially dogs.

Despite being vaccine-preventable, rabies still causes thousands of deaths, mainly in Africa and Southeast Asia. Limited access to post-exposure treatment is a key reason for its continued toll.

Hemorrhagic Fevers: Ebola, Marburg, and CCHF

Several of the viruses on the list cause viral hemorrhagic fevers, including Ebola, Marburg, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF). These diseases often lead to severe internal bleeding and organ failure.

Ebola and Marburg both have fatality rates around 50%, with outbreaks concentrated in Central and Sub-Saharan Africa. The 2014–2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak alone killed over 11,000 people and brought global attention to epidemic preparedness.

CCHF, transmitted primarily through ticks and livestock, is more geographically widespread across Eurasia and Africa. While its fatality rate ranges from 10–40%, it causes an estimated 1,000–2,000 deaths annually.

Zoonotic Spillover: From Bats to Camels

Most of the viruses ranked here originate in animals. Fruit bats are linked to Nipah and Marburg viruses, while rodents are associated with Lujo virus. Camels are the primary reservoir for MERS-CoV, first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012.

Avian influenza (H5N1) spreads from infected birds and has a roughly 50% fatality rate among confirmed human cases—far higher than seasonal flu. Although human infections remain relatively rare, the high case fatality rate has kept global health authorities on alert.

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Countries With the Biggest Gains in Life Expectancy on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Tyler Durden Tue, 02/24/2026 - 02:45

Pages